Objective To assess the acceptability and preferences of HPV screening with self‐sampling and mobile phone results delivery among women living with HIV (WLWH) in Botswana, as an alternative to traditional speculum screening. Methods WLWH aged 25 years or older attending an infectious disease clinic in Gaborone were enrolled in a cross‐sectional study between March and April 2017. Women self‐sampled with a flocked swab, had a speculum exam, and completed an interviewer‐administered questionnaire about screening acceptability, experiences, and preferences. Results Of the 104 WLWH recruited, 98 (94%) had a history of traditional screening. Over 90% agreed self‐sampling was easy and comfortable. Ninety‐five percent were willing to self‐sample again; however, only 19% preferred self‐sampling over speculum exam for future screening. Preferences differed by education and residence with self‐sampling being considered more convenient, easier, less embarrassing, and less painful. Speculum exams were preferred because of trust in providers’ skills and women's low self‐efficacy to sample correctly. Almost half (47%) preferred to receive results via mobile phone call. Knowledge of cervical cancer did not affect preferences. Conclusion HPV self‐sampling is acceptable among WLWH in Botswana; however, preferences vary. Although self‐sampling is an important alternative to traditional speculum screening, education and support will be critical to address women's low self‐efficacy to self‐sample correctly.
Objective: Women experiencing homelessness are at increased risk of cervical cancer and have disproportionately low Pap screening behaviors compared to the general population. Prevalence of Pap refusals and multiple kinds of trauma, specifically sexual trauma, are high among homeless women. This qualitative study explored how trauma affects Pap screening experiences, behaviors, and provider practices in the context of homelessness. Methods: We conducted 29 in-depth interviews with patients and providers from multiple sites of a Federally Qualified Health Center as part of a study on barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among urban women experiencing homelessness. The Health Belief Model and trauma-informed frameworks guided the analysis. Results: Trauma histories were common among the 18 patients we interviewed. Many women also had strong physical and psychological reactions to screening, which influenced current behaviors and future intentions. Although most women had screened at least once in their lifetime, many patients experienced anticipated anxiety and retraumatization which pushed them to delay or refuse Paps. We recruited 11 providers who identified strategies they used to encourage screening, including emphasizing safety and shared decision-making before and during the exam, building strong patient–provider trust and communication, and individually tailoring education and counseling to patients’ needs. We outlined suggestions and implications from these findings as trauma-informed cervical cancer screening. Conclusion: Discomfort with Pap screening was common among women experiencing homelessness, especially those with histories of sexual trauma. Applying a trauma-informed approach to cervical cancer screening may help address complex barriers among women experiencing homelessness, with histories of sexual trauma, or others who avoid, delay, or refuse the exam.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis involves significant contributions from genetic and environmental factors. Loss-of-function single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 2 (PTPN2) gene increase IBD risk and are associated with altered microbiome population dynamics in IBD. Expansion of intestinal pathobionts, such as adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC), is strongly implicated in IBD pathogenesis as AIEC increases proinflammatory cytokine production and alters tight junction protein regulationsuggesting a potential mechanism of pathogen-induced barrier dysfunction and inflammation. We aimed to determine if PTPN2 deficiency alters intestinal microbiome composition to promote expansion of specific bacteria with pathogenic properties. In mice constitutively lacking Ptpn2, we identified increased abundance of a novel mouse AIEC (mAIEC) that showed similar adherence and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells, but greater survival in macrophages, to the IBD-associated AIEC, LF82. Furthermore, mAIEC caused disease when administered to mice lacking segmented-filamentous bacteria (SFB), and in germ-free mice but only when reconstituted with a microbiome, thus supporting its classification as a pathobiont, not a pathogen. Moreover, mAIEC infection increased the severity of, and prevented recovery from, induced colitis. Although mAIEC genome sequence analysis showed >90% similarity to LF82, mAIEC contained putative virulence genes with >50% difference in gene/protein identities from LF82 indicating potentially distinct genetic features of mAIEC. We show for the first time that an IBD susceptibility gene, PTPN2, modulates the gut microbiome to protect against a novel pathobiont. This study generates new insights into geneenvironment-microbiome interactions in IBD and identifies a new model to study AIEC-host interactions.
Background Anthropometry is the most commonly used approach for assessing nutritional need among children. Anthropometry alone, however, cannot differentiate between the two immediate causes of undernutrition: inadequate diet vs disease. We present a typology of nutritional need by simultaneously considering dietary and anthropometric measures, dietary and anthropometric failures (DAF), and assess its distribution among children in India. Methods We used the 2015-16 National Family Health Survey, a nationally representative sample of children aged 6-23 months (n = 67 247), from India. Dietary failure was operationalized using World Health Organization (WHO) standards for minimum dietary diversity. Anthropometric failure was operationalized using WHO child growth reference standard z-score of <-2 for height-for-age (stunting), weight-for-age (underweight) and weight-for-height (wasting). We also created a combined anthropometric measure for children who had any one of these three anthropometric failures. We cross-tabulated dietary and anthropometric failures to produce four combinations: Dietary Failure Only (DFO), Anthropometric Failure Only (AFO), Both Failures (BF), and Neither Failure (NF). We estimated the prevalence and distribution of the four types, nationally, and across 640 administrative districts and 543 Parliamentary Constituencies (PCs) in India. Results Nationally, 80.3% of children had dietary failure and 53.7% had at least one anthropometric failure. The prevalence for the four DAF types was: 44.0% (BF), 36.3% (DFO), 9.8% (AFO), and 9.9% (NF). Dietary and anthropometric measures were discordant for 46.1% of children; these children had nutritional needs identified by only one of the two measures. Nationally, this translates to 12 181 627 children with DFO and 3 281 913 children with AFO; the nutritional needs of these children would not be captured if using only dietary or anthropometric assessment. Substantial variation was observed across districts and PCs for all DAF types. The interquartile ranges for districts were largest for BF (29.8%-53.0%) and lowest for AFO (5.5%-13.4%). Conclusions The current emphasis on anthropometry for measuring nutritional need should be complemented with diet- and food-based measures. By differentiating inadequate food intake from other causes of undernutrition, the DAF typology brings precision in identifying nutritional needs among children. These insights may improve the development and targeting of nutrition interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.