Keratins are proteins that form intermediate filaments of epithelial cell cytoskeleton. The utility of keratin expression determination is based on the fact that epithelial cells acquire a specific pattern of keratin expression during differentiation and maturation, which reflects the specificity of the tissue and the degree of maturation, and generally remains stable during carcinogenesis. Determination of the pattern makes it possible to identify the origin of cells in diagnosing neoplastic lesions as well as in research on pathophysiology or the possibility to apply keratin-positive cell detection in the process of cancer staging and treatment planning. As keratins undergo degradation during apoptosis as caspase substrate the identification of the caspase-derived K18 fragment by the use of specific monoclonal antibody allows us to estimate the apoptosis/necrosis ratio, especially in liver pathology, e.g. nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic hepatitis or graft-versus-host disease or in assessing response to antiviral or antitumour therapy.
IntroductionPancreatic solid tumour diagnoses remain a challenge for modern medicine. However, using endosonography together with elastography helps to examine the elasticity of tissues and therefore may allow definition of the nature of pancreatic tumours.AimTo evaluate the usefulness of elastography with the strain ratio method and quantitative evaluation of pancreatic solid tumours.Material and methodsA total of 54 patients with pancreatic solid tumours were treated with ultrasound endosonography with fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The control group contained 26 patients with normal pancreas. Pancreatic solid tumours and normal pancreas were analysed with elastography and elasticity evaluation of the interest area (A), reference (B), and the strain ratio factor (B/A). Postoperative histopathological or cytological examinations were the final diagnoses. Both postoperative and cytological diagnoses were compared with average elasticity parameters (A) and strain ratio factors (B/A).ResultsAverage elasticity parameters (A) and the strain ratio factors (B/A) were: 0.025% (0.01–0.05%) for malignant process, and (B/A) 33.93 (18.23–75.45); (A) – 0.26% (0.14–0.35%), and (B/A) 5.35 (3.47–7.8) for inflammatory process; (A) 0.54% (0.35–0.82%), and (B/A) 1.79 (1.02–2.05) for normal pancreatic tissue.ConclusionsMalignant tumours have higher tightness factor compared to inflammatory tumours and normal pancreatic tissue. Elasticity parameters reach the highest levels in normal pancreatic tissue, lower in inflammatory tumours, and the lowest in malignant tumours.
PurposeIdentifying the primary etiology of cardio-renal syndrome in a timely manner remains an ongoing challenge in nephrology. We hypothesized that hypertensive kidney damage can be distinguished from chronic glomerulonephritis at an early stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) using ultrasound (US) Doppler sonography.MethodsFifty-six males (age 54 ± 15, BMI 28.3 ± 3.5 kg/m2) with hypertension and stable CKD at stages 2–4 [38 with essential hypertension (HT-CKD); 18 with glomerulonephritis (GN-CKD)] were studied. Blood tests, UACR, echocardiography, ABPM, carotid IMT, and an ultrasound dynamic tissue perfusion measurement (DTPM) of the renal cortex were performed.ResultsHT-CKD patients had reduced proximal renal cortex perfusion as well as reduced total and proximal renal cortex arterial area. Proximal renal cortex arterial area ≤0.149 cm2 identified hypertension-related CKD with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 78% (AUC 0.753, p < 0.001).ConclusionsEvidence of diminished arterial vascularity or perfusion of renal proximal cortex, both derived from US Doppler, could be helpful in differentiating hypertensive nephropathy from glomerulonephritis-related CKD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.