Introduction: Noise is one of the physical hazards that can not be separated from the industrial environment which causes noise that arises as the result of production activities. The Auditory and non-auditory impacts can affect the workers. This study aims to analyze the relation between intensity of noise with auditory threshold value on the field operators who work in the compressor house area. Method: This was an observational analytic using a cross-sectional design. The population was the overall number of workers and the sample was 32 peoples, determined using simple random sampling method. The independent variables in this study were the noise intensity, age and working period meanwhile the dependent variable was the auditory threshold value. Data were obtained by field observations and the results of questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using Pearson Correlation tests. Result and Discussion: There was a relation between noise intensity with right ear auditory threshold value (p = 0.009) but no relation with left ear auditory threshold value (p = 0.085). Age has no relation with right ear auditory threshold value (p = 0.161) and left ear auditory threshold value (p = 0.169). The working period has no relation with right ear auditory threshold value (p = 360) and left ear auditory threshold value ( p= 0,173). Conclusion: The conclucion is the noise intensity has a relation with the exixtence of right ear hearing disturbance.

Latar Belakang: Upaya peningkatan derajat kesehatan pada sektor lingkungan salah satunya dengan pengadaan sarana lingkungan fisik yang sehat seperti jamban keluarga. Berdasarkan data Laporan Kemajuan Akses Sanitasi Kumulatif Nasional Tahun 2019, penduduk Jawa Timur yang masih menumpang ke jamban sehat sebanyak 879.969 Kepala Keluarga dan yang berperilaku Open Deficiation (OD) sebanyak 969.663 KK.Tujuan: Menganalisis perbedaan faktor enabling terhadap praktik buang air besar antara desa belum ODF dengan desa ODF.Metode: Jenis penelitian observasional analitik kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan desain penelitian Cross Sectional. Dianalisis secara univariate menggunakan uji One Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test dan bivariat menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney U test”. Dari uji ini diperoleh kemungkinan hasil uji yaitu signifikan atau bermakna α = 0,05 maka terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna antara variable yang diuji. Hipotesa diterima apabila p value ≤ 0,05.Hasil: Uji statistik Mann Whitney U test menyatakan adanya perbedaan pada praktik buang air besar antara desa belum ODF (Kelurahan Jagir) dan desa ODF (Kelurahan Ketintang) dimana pada kepemilikan lahan pada Kelurahan Jagir masyarakat tidak memiliki lahan sendiri dan lahan yang ditempati merupakan milik PT. KAI yang berpengaruh pada ketersediaan jamban sehat, sekalipun memiliki jamban tetapi tidak dilengkapi dengan septic tank, sedangkan pada Kelurahan Ketintang rata-rata masyarakat memiliki lahan sendiri, sehingga mempermudah masyarakat memiliki jamban yang dilengkapi dengan septic tank. Hal ini dikarenakan nilai p-value = 0,000 < dari α (0,05), dimana jika p-value < α, maka H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima.Kesimpulan: Lahan yang ditempati  masyarakat Jagir bukan milik sendiri sehingga mempersulit warga untuk membangun jamban sehat, serta jamban yang ada tidak memenuhi persyaratan jamban sehat, sedangkan masyarakat Ketintang yang rata-rata tinggal di dekat sungai tetapi telah menerapkan praktik buang air besar yang benar dengan menggunakan jamban sehat.AbstractBackground: One of the efforts to improve health status in the environmental sector is the provision of a healthy physical environment such as family toilet. Based on data from the 2019 National Cumulative Access to Sanitation Progress Report, the population of East Java who still uses healthy latrines is 879,969 households and those who have Open Deficiation (OD) behavior are 969,663 families. Objective: Intervention of possible factors needs to be done because these factors are supporting/enabling factors, where if we do a certain intervention it will be difficult if the facilities and infrastructure are not available/ not supported. Methods: This type of research is observational analytic quantitative and qualitative whith a cross sectional research design. The data analysis technique was univariate using the One Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and bivariate analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test. From this test, it is obtained that the test results are signicant or significant α = 0.05, so there is a significant difference between the tested variables. The hypothesis is accepted if the p value is ≤ 0.05. Results: The statistical  test of the Mann Whitney U test states that there is a differences in the practice of defecating between Kelurahan Jagir and Kelurahan Ketintang where in land ownership in Kelurahan Jagir, the community does not own their own land and the land occupied is owned by PT.KAI has an effect on the availability of healthy latrines, even though it has a latrine but is not equipped with a septic tank, while in Ketintang Village the average person has their own land, making it easier for the community to have a toilet equipped with a septic tank. Conclusion: The land occupied by the Jagir community is not their own, making it difficult for residents to build healthy latrines, and the existing latrines do not meet the requirements for healthy latrines, while the Ketintang community who mostly live near the river but have implemented the correct practice of defecating using healthy latrines.

ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Cara buang air besar merupakan suatu perilaku yang dianggap baik jika seseorang melakukannya dengan benar yaitu di jamban namun, kenyataanya masih banyak masyarakat di perkotaan yang masih melakukan kebiasaan buang air besar sembarangan (BABS). Kebiasaan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh adanya faktor predisposisi dari masing-masing individu yang terdiri dari sikap dan pengetahuan.  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan faktor predisposisi terhadap cara buang air besar pada kampung belum ODF dan kampung ODF di Surabaya.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan observasional analitik dengan desain penelitian cross sectional. Populasi penelitian yaitu seluruh masyarakat yang tinggal di Kampung belum ODF di Kelurahan Jagir terdiri dari  3 RT pada RW 10 sebanyak 215 KK dan kampung ODF di Kelurahan Ketintang terdiri dari 2 RT pada RW 3 sebanyak 147 KK. Besar sampel dihitung menggunakan rumus Slovin didapatkan sebanyak 68 responden di kampung belum ODF dan 60 responden di kampung ODF. Data primer bersumber dari wawancara berdasarkan kuesioner dan data sekunder dari profil masing-masing kelurahan. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney U test. Hasil: Hasil dari penelitian ini didapatkan adanya berbedaan sikap (p=0,00) dan pengetahuan (p=0,00) terhadap cara buang air besar pada kampung belum ODF dan kampung ODF.Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan faktor predisposisi terhadap cara buang air besar masyarakat di kampung belum ODF dan kampung ODF. Penelitian ini menyarakan untuk melaksanakan penyuluhan terkait cara buang air besar yang baik. ABSTRACT Background: How to defecate is a good behavior if someone actually does it in the latrine, however, in fact there are still many people in urban areas who still practice open defecation (BABS). This habit is obtained from the presence of predisposing factors from each individual consisting of attitudes and knowledge.  Objectives: This study aims to look at the peaceful predisposing factors for defecating in non-ODF and ODF villages in Surabaya. Methods: This study was an observational analytic study with a cross sectional design. The population of the study was all people who live in non-ODF Villages in Jagir Village consist of 3 RT in RW 10 of 215 families and ODF Villages in Ketintang Village consist of 2 RT in RW 3 of 147 families. The sample size was calculated using the Slovin formula. It was found that 68 in non-ODF villages and 60 respondents in ODF villages. Primary data sourced from interviews based on questionnaires and secondary data got from sub district profile. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.Results: The results of this study found that there were different attitudes (p=0.00) and knowledge (p=0.00) on how to defecate in villages that were non-ODF villages and ODF villages.Conclusions: There are differences in predisposing factors for how to defecate in communities not yet ODF and in ODF villages. This research suggests to carry out education related to good defecation methods.

Introduction: Open defecation behavior can be a means of spreading disease. A person’s defecation behavior can be influenced by supporting factors provided by health workers, the socio-cultural environment and access to healthy latrine facilities. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of families, community leaders, health workers and the socio-cultural environment on defecating behavior in ODF and non-ODF villages. Methods: This study used quantitative and qualitative observational analytic. The study design was cross sectional design. All people who live on the banks of railway in non ODF and ODF villages were the population in this study. A total of 68 peoples were sampled who determined by themethod proportional random sampling. The independent variables were family support, sanitarian support, community leaders support, the health department team support, socio-culture and population density. The dependent variable was defecation activity. Data were collected by field observation and questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using the Mann Whitney Test. Results and Discussion: There was no difference in family support (p = 0.661), community leaders support (p = 0.122), the health department team support (p = 0.555). However, there were differences in sanitarian officers support (p = 0.000), the socio-cultural environment (p = 0.000) and the population density in non ODF villages is higher than in ODF villages. Conclusion: There were differences in sanitarian officers support, the socio-cultural environment and population density between non ODF and ODF villages.

Background: One of the issues in burn patients is decreasing the body immune system and making it difficult to treat. Probiotics, which are commonly used to treat GI tract imbalances, are also known to be able to modulate the immune system. Objectives: This scoping review aims to explore literature about the effects of probiotics on the immune system in burn patients and to identify gaps in the existing literature. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in six electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane, EBSCO/CINAHL, DOAJ and other databases) to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies, with time limits from June 2005 until November 2020, using search terms with database-appropriate keywords. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. Results: We identified 901 articles. Of these, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. In this Scoping Review, the proportion of probiotic combination types mostly used multi-strain probiotic combinations. The frequency and types of probiotic strains most widely used was Lactobacillus spp (58%). The highest concentration of oral probiotics route used was in the total probiotic cell content of 109 CFU (42%) and the duration of probiotic administration was 14 days (50%). Meanwhile, improvement of the immune system in burns has been shown by the laboratory outcome parameters (increased the secretion of IgA, decreased of CRP serum, IL-6, leukocytes, and neutrophils), and also the clinical outcome parameters (improvement of GI imbalance, decreased the mortality, decreased the risk of SIRS/sepsis, and shortened Length of Hospital Stay). Conclusions: To perform the modulation of the immune system in burns, the optimal dose, strain, and duration of probiotic administration has not been established or still varies widely. Therefore, more clinical studies are needed using placebos or controls to get better validity regarding the evidence of effectiveness and safety at various degrees of burns.