This writing aims to analyze and identify the legal regulations and politics of registration (certification) of land rights in the context of Indonesian land law, particularly in Law No.5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Regulations (UUPA) amidst various agrarian conflicts and legal certainty documents over land rights that occur in Indonesia. This research will also seek to find comparisons that regulate and the politics of registering land rights in other countries. This is a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a comparative law approach. The results of the research show that the UUPA is a legal product in the field of agriculture that is unification for all Indonesians which is a mandate of the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Various agrarian conflicts that occur in Indonesia are caused by problems with land titles. Legal certainty through the certification of land rights is the answer to what agrarian law politics wants, considering that to create agrarian politics that makes people prosperous, protection of the rights inherent in land is needed. Through a clear foundation of rights will be able to increase economic value for landowners and improve the welfare of the Indonesian people at large. The regulation and politics of land registration law in several other countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico and Ethiopia also show the certification of land rights as an effort to provide protection and legal certainty for land that is used for community welfare.

Tie-dye is known as a method of dyeing which results in a design on the fabric by which the fabric is collected and tied tightly with fibers, rope, or yarn, then dyed or colored. The cloth is then processed into clothes, masks, and other accessories which can now be easily found in several online shops. This paper aims to identify, analyze, and elaborate on the legal protection of tie-dye motifs based on Indonesia Law Number 28 the Year 2014 concerning Copyright and the responsibilities of influencers who promote tie-dyed motif products. This is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of tracing legal materials uses document study techniques and the analysis of studies uses qualitative analysis. The study shows that the tie-dye motif has been protected under Copyright law both nationally and internationally. Tie-dye motif as a form of continues to be developed with a high economic value has received clear protection under Indonesia Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The clear arrangement of tie-dyes is becoming increasingly important, especially when tie-dyes are used commercially. Regarding the Announcement of a copyrighted work, such as tie-dye products, the element of the uniqueness of form and originality are important points in copyright

Negara diakui sebagai salah satu subjek hukum dalam Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Negara memiliki kedaulatan untuk mengatur barang atau jasa yang keluar dan memasuki wilayahnya. Kewenangan mengatur tersebut termasuk dalam kedudukannya pada posisi Negara sebagai pedagang. Dalam perkembangannya kedudukan Negara juga menjadi pihak pembeli. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengekplorasi kedudukan negara sebagai pembeli dalam konteks  hukum perdagangan internasional dan penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat diambil oleh Negara berdasarkan Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan analitis dan konseptual. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa suatu Negara dapat menjadi pembeli melalui BUMN yang diwajibkan untuk memberitahukan perusahaan tersebut kepada Council for Trade in Good sebagai implementasi dari prinsip non-diskriminasi dan juga untuk menjamin transparansi kegiatan perdagangan. Dalam pengertian Negara sebagai pembeli, dapat dipahami bahwa hubungan perdagangan yang terjadi antara Negara sebagai pembeli dan pedagang adalah hubungan kontraktual. Oleh karena itu, prinsip kebebasan berkontrak, termasuk prinsip pemilihan cara penyelesaian sengketa dapat diterapkan, baik mengenai pilihan hukum maupun pilihan forum.

Tujuan penulisan jurnalni adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan mengenai alih daya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan dan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja serta dapat mengetahui mengenai penghapusan pengaturan jenis pekerjaan yang ada dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dapat memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja alih daya di Indonesia atau sebaliknya. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan jurnal ini adalah metode penelitian normatif. Dengan pendekatan perundang – undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa pengapusan jenis pekerjaan yang dapat dialihdayakan yang pada awalnya diatur dalam pasal 66 Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan dihapus didalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja yang menimbulkan kekaburan norma. Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja yang semula diharapkan agar dapat memberikan keadilan pada pekerja malah mengalami kemunduran yang berefek pada dapat terjadinya eksploitasi pada pekerja dan tidak terjaminnya hak – hak pekerja di Indonesia. The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the regulation regarding outsourcing based on the Manpower Act and the Job Creation Law and to find out about the abolition of the type of work arrangement in the Job Creation Law, which can strengthen legal protection for outsourced workers in Indonesia or vice versa. The research method used in writing this journal is a normative research method. With a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the abolition of the types of work that can be outsourced which was originally regulated in Article 66 of the Manpower Law is abolished in the Job Creation Law which creates a blurring of norms. The Job Creation Law, which was originally expected to provide justice for workers, has actually experienced a setback which has an effect on exploitation of workers and the insecurity of workers' rights in Indonesia.

This study aimed to examine the effect of the disputes classification in the industrial settlement system, comparing arrangements according to the perspective of the International Labor Organization, China, Japan, and Kazakhstan, and trying to find the ideal concept of the type of industrial dispute to apply in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research. The approaches used in this study were the statutory approach, conceptual approach, fact approach, and comparative approach. The results revealed that the classification of disputes in the industrial relations settlement system in Indonesia has an impact on the difficulty of the parties in classifying their disputes. Comparative studies were conducted to determine the classification of disputes in international law as well as in China, Japan, and Kazakhstan. The ideal concept that can be offered to Indonesia is the simplification or elimination of the classification of industrial relations to provide dispute resolution by applying the principles of fast, precise, fair, and inexpensive methods.