This study has been designed to investigate, in five non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients, the influence of physical training (1 h a day, 7 days a wk for 6 wk, at 50-60% maximum oxygen uptake) on blood glucose control, glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, and insulin action. Physical training resulted in a significant improvement in blood glucose control, glucose tolerance, and insulin action. These results suggest that short-term intense physical training ameliorates the main metabolic derangements of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Our data show that both lisinopril and nifedipine are effective in delaying the occurrence of macroalbuminuria in normotensive IDDM patients with MA. As overt proteinuria strongly predicts end-stage renal failure, both treatments appear capable of preventing such a complication in normotensive IDDM patients with MA. However, lisinopril appears more powerful in slowing the course of nephropathy.
The effect of metformin on Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes has been assessed with the artificial pancreas. Fourteen Type 1 diabetic patients of normal body weight received in addition to their usual insulin therapy 850 mg metformin or placebo three times a day for 4-6 weeks. The sequence was placebo-metformin in eight patients and metformin-placebo in the other six. On the last day of metformin or placebo treatment, an artificial pancreas was used for about 36 h to assess insulin requirement. There was a 25.8% reduction in insulin requirement during metformin management despite slightly lower blood glucose levels (5.25 +/- 0.20 versus 5.98 +/- 0.18 mmol/l, p less than 0.01). Maximum reduction (about 50%) occurred 2 h after both lunch and dinner. There was no nocturnal effect. A marked decrease in specific insulin binding before metformin was found (0.56 +/- 0.27% to 10(7) monocytes versus 2.82 +/- 0.75 of control subjects) and significant increase after metformin (1.36 +/- 0.36%, p less than 0.05). There were no significant changes in blood lactate, total and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and C-peptide levels. These results show that insulin receptor binding is diminished in Type 1 diabetes, perhaps as a consequence of higher peripheral blood insulin levels and that metformin can improve binding, and so reduce the amount of insulin needed to reach euglycaemia. The insulin sparing effect is greatest after meals, and interference with intestinal absorption of sugars may also be important. It follows that metformin could be usefully administered to Type 1 diabetic patients with unimpaired liver and renal function to reduce their insulin requirement.
We screened for celiac disease, by means of IgA class anti-endomysium antibodies (EmA), 383 consecutive adults with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Two control populations entered the study as well: 151 adults with biopsy proven celiac disease, as true positives; and 520 controls (healthy and diseased) as true negatives. IgA-EmA positivity was found in 145 of 151 (96%) celiac disease patients but in none of the controls (100% specificity). EmA were positive in 12 of 383 (3.13%) IDDM patients: 10 of these positives underwent intestinal biopsy, which showed either partial or total villous atrophy. Only one patient presented with gastrointestinal complaints, but severe iron deficiency was found in all. The IDDM celiac patients were started on a gluten-free diet: four refused both the diet and the follow-up protocol. Approximately one year after gluten withdrawal no significant change in the degree of diabetes control was observed, while an increased requirement for insulin was observed in three of four patients who strictly complied with the diet. The prevalence of biopsy-proven celiac disease among adult IDDM patients (1:38), eight times higher than that recently estimated for the general Italian population and the absence, except in one case, of gastrointestinal symptoms emphasizes the benefit of screening programs on populations at risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.