1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00251823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metformin reduces insulin requirement in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes

Abstract: The effect of metformin on Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes has been assessed with the artificial pancreas. Fourteen Type 1 diabetic patients of normal body weight received in addition to their usual insulin therapy 850 mg metformin or placebo three times a day for 4-6 weeks. The sequence was placebo-metformin in eight patients and metformin-placebo in the other six. On the last day of metformin or placebo treatment, an artificial pancreas was used for about 36 h to assess insulin requirement. There was a 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the failure of metformin to reduce the hyperglycaemia in BB/S rats substantiates the view that a therapeutic concentration of metformin does not mimic the actions of insulin in conditions of severe insulinopenia (Sterne, 1969;Bailey, 1992). However, the hypoglycaemic effect of exogenous insulin was augmented by metformin, as noted in other diabetic states (Lord et al, 1983;Pagano et al, 1983;Gin et al, 1985;Leblanc et al, 1987).…”
Section: Ivgtt In Diabetic Bb/s Ratsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the failure of metformin to reduce the hyperglycaemia in BB/S rats substantiates the view that a therapeutic concentration of metformin does not mimic the actions of insulin in conditions of severe insulinopenia (Sterne, 1969;Bailey, 1992). However, the hypoglycaemic effect of exogenous insulin was augmented by metformin, as noted in other diabetic states (Lord et al, 1983;Pagano et al, 1983;Gin et al, 1985;Leblanc et al, 1987).…”
Section: Ivgtt In Diabetic Bb/s Ratsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In particular, controversy exists concerning a possible association between the mode of action of metformin and that of insulin. Metformin cannot sustain life in totally pancreatectomized animals (Sterne, 1969), but it increases the blood glucose-lowering efficacy of insulin in hyperglycaemic and insulin resistant states (Pagano et al, 1983;Gin et al, 1985;Prager et al, 1986;Leblanc et al, 1987;Nosadini et al, 1987;Hother-Nielsen et al, 1989;Reaven et al, 1992). Thus it has been assumed, but not actually demonstrated, that the blood glucose-lowering effect of metformin requires the presence of insulin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 47 of these publications were judged to be relevant to metformin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Analysis of publications revealed: 17 were observational studies with no random allocation and/or no comparator group [18,22,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]; 11 were reviews, letters or commentaries [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]; two did not contain any quantitative estimates of effects [54,55]; one concerned an outcome (erythrocyte binding of insulin) not judged relevant [56]; and four were abstracts of papers subsequently published [57][58][59][60]. Of the remaining 12 publications, one concerned insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes rather than type 1 diabetes (noted after translation) [61], and one covered a treatment period of fewer than 7 days [62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Observational; no random allocation and/or comparator groups (n=17) [18,22,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] • Review, commentary, letter (n=11) [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] • Insufficient numerical data (n=2) [54,55] • No relevant outcome (n=1) [56] • Abstract of later paper (n=4) [57][58][59][60] • No evidence of type 1 diabetes after translation (n=1)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have been small (11), were uncontrolled (12), or were cross-over trials of short duration (10). Even in one previous trial involving the administration of insulin by CSII, the duration of treatment was only 3 weeks (19), and during this period, IR was not modified.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%