The classical identification of Botryosphaeriaceae fungi, causing dieback and local dead arms in many plant species, is very difficult and time-consuming. Some of the molecular tools, such as PCR using species-specific primed, RFLP (Restricted Fragment Length Polymorphism) or gene sequencing are necessary for the fast identification of species. This study aims to contribute for the fast identification of some fungal species belonging Botryosphaeriaceae family reported up to now in Turkey vineyards. DNA was extracted from the 25 isolates obtained from the Aegean and Mediterranean Regions, and 4 different species (Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia seriata, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, and Neofusicoccum parvum) and β-tubulin (TUB2) and ITS region (specific for Botryosphaeriaceae genus) on genomic DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reactions. This region was digested by five different restriction endonuclease enzymes (AluI, BsaHI, MboI, RsaI, TaqI) and band profiles were analyzed on an agarose gel (2%). According to the results of the analysis, the region, amplified with genus-specific primers, was not suitable for RFLP analysis. On the other hand, to discriminate these species, it was revealed that the β-tubulin gene region should be digested at least two different restriction enzymes. The enzyme BsaHI generated two different band sizes for B. dothidea and D. seriata (250 and 700 bp for the first; 400 and 600 bp for the second one) digesting β-tubulin gene of these species but this enzyme could not generate any discriminative bands for L. theobromae and N. parvum. However the enzyme TaqI could not discriminate B. dothidea and D. seriata but digest β-tubulin gene of L. theobromae and N. parvum at two points and it generated three different bands (for L. theobromae: 200-400-800 bp and for N. parvum: 200-400-650 bp).
Diaporthe ampelina (=Phomopsis viticola) is one of the most important pathogens causing both cane/leaf spot and wood canker diseases in grape growing countries in the world. In this research, morphological, molecular and pathogenic characterization of 23 D. ampelina isolates were studied and their sensitivity was tested against hot-water treatments and some of the fungicides used in vineyards. Morphologically, the isolates were grouped according to “W type” and “G type” colony appearance and microscopic features. In molecular characterization, beta-tubulin, calmodulin and translation elongation factor (tef1-α) gene regions were amplified with PCR. The nucleotide sequences were analyzed using NCBI-BLAST search and recorded in GenBank, through which species identity was also confirmed. Mycelial viability was tested against hot-water treatments (46 – 50°C for 30 and 45 min) in centrifuge tubes and thermal inactivation point was determined. It was also tested against some of the fungicides (azoxystrobin, boscalid, cyprodinil, tebuconazole, azoxystrobin + cyproconazole + tebuconazole, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, azoxystrobin + tebuconazole and fludioxonil) in vitro and EC50 values were calculated. The morphological and molecular study results showed that all the isolates were D. ampelina and they were pathogenic on wood tissues of vines. Thermal inactivation of “W type” isolates was ensured at 48°C-30 min hot-water treatments. Although this treatment also reduced colony growth of “G type” isolates, it did not inhibit it completely and 48°C-45 min treatment was needed to reach full eradication. Considering fungicide sensitivity, fludioxonil or tebuconazole containing fungicides were the most effective in suppressing the mycelial growth of the fungus. However, azoxystrobin, boscalid, cyprodinil could not perform a strong inhibition when compared to fludioxonil and tebuconazole.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.