Objectives
To explore the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiating between lung adenocarcinomas appearing as ground‐glass opacity nodules (GGO) with high‐ and low Ki‐67 expression levels.
Materials and Methods
From January 2018 to January 2021, patients with pulmonary GGO who received lung resection were evaluated for potential enrollment. The included GGOs were then randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort with a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), support vector machines (SVM), and adaboost (AB) were applied for radiomic model construction. Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the established models.
Results
Seven hundred and sixty‐nine patients with 769 GGOs were included in this study. Two hundred and forty‐five GGOs were confirmed to be of high Ki‐67 labeling index (LI). In the training cohort, gender, age, spiculation sign, pleural indentation sign, bubble sign, and maximum 2D diameter of the nodule were found to be significantly different between high‐ and low Ki‐67 LI groups (p < 0.05), and spiculation sign and maximum 2D diameter of the nodule were further confirmed to be risk factors for Ki‐67 LI. The radiomic model established using SVM exhibited an AUC of 0.731 in the validation cohort, which was higher than that of the clinical‐radiographic model (AUC = 0.675). Moreover, radiomic model combining both intra‐ and peri‐nodular features showed better diagnostic efficacy than using intra‐nodular features alone (AUC = 0.731 and 0.720, respectively).
Conclusions
The established radiomic model exhibited good diagnostic efficacy in differentiating between lung adenocarcinoma GGOs with high and low Ki‐67 LI, which was higher than the clinical‐radiographic model. Peri‐nodular radiomic features showed added benefits to the radiomic model. As a novel noninvasive method, radiomics have the potential to be applied in the preliminary classification of Ki‐67 expression level in lung adenocarcinoma GGOs.
The detection of mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (pTERT) is important since preoperative diagnosis of pTERT status helps with evaluating prognosis and determining the surgical strategy. Here, we aimed to establish a radiomics-based machine-learning algorithm and evaluated its performance with regard to the prediction of mutations in pTERT in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II gliomas. In total, 164 patients with WHO grade II gliomas were enrolled in this retrospective study. We extracted a total of 1,293 radiomics features from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans. Elastic net (used for feature selection) and support vector machine with linear kernel were applied in nested 10-fold cross-validation loops. The predictive model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall analyses. We performed an unpaired t-test to compare the posterior predictive probabilities among patients with differing pTERT statuses. We selected 12 valuable radiomics features using nested 10-fold cross-validation loops. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8446 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7735–0.9065) with an optimal summed value of sensitivity of 0.9355 (95% CI, 0.8802–0.9788) and specificity of 0.6197 (95% CI, 0.5071–0.7371). The overall accuracy was 0.7988 (95% CI, 0.7378–0.8598). The F1-score was 0.8406 (95% CI, 0.7684–0.902) with an optimal precision of 0.7632 (95% CI, 0.6818–0.8364) and recall of 0.9355 (95% CI, 0.8802–0.9788). Posterior probabilities of pTERT mutations were significantly different between patients with wild-type and mutant TERT promoters. Our findings suggest that a radiomics analysis with a machine-learning algorithm can be useful for predicting pTERT status in patients with WHO grade II glioma and may aid in glioma management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.