The development of electrocatalysts capable of efficient reduction of nitrate (NO3−) to ammonia (NH3) is drawing increasing interest for the sake of low carbon emission and environmental protection. Herein, we present a CuCo bimetallic catalyst able to imitate the bifunctional nature of copper-type nitrite reductase, which could easily remove NO2− via the collaboration of two active centers. Indeed, Co acts as an electron/proton donating center, while Cu facilitates NOx− adsorption/association. The bio-inspired CuCo nanosheet electrocatalyst delivers a 100 ± 1% Faradaic efficiency at an ampere-level current density of 1035 mA cm−2 at −0.2 V vs. Reversible Hydrogen Electrode. The NH3 production rate reaches a high activity of 4.8 mmol cm−2 h−1 (960 mmol gcat−1 h−1). A mechanistic study, using electrochemical in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and shell-isolated nanoparticle enhanced Raman spectroscopy, reveals a strong synergy between Cu and Co, with Co sites promoting the hydrogenation of NO3− to NH3 via adsorbed *H species. The well-modulated coverage of adsorbed *H and *NO3 led simultaneously to high NH3 selectivity and yield.

Extending the charge cutoff voltage of cathode (e.g., LiCoO2) is a promising way to increase the energy density of Li-ion batteries, but critical challenges lie in the threats triggered by structural distortion and an unstable electrode/electrolyte interface. The general approach to enhance the stability of the cathode/electrolyte interface (CEI) consists of replacing the decomposition or sacrificing sources of carbonate solvents (e.g., EC) with concentrated or fluorinated electrolyte strategies. Herein, without following typical replacement strategies, we introduce a trace electrolyte additive and refine the dehydrogenation process of the original carbonate solvents, resulting in an enhanced CEI and long-term cycling stability of LiCoO2 up to 4.65 V. We demonstrate that cathode structure distortion, LiPF6 hydrolysis, and Co dissolution and shuttling have been simultaneously restrained. With the achievement of a long-life 250 and 270 Wh/kg pouch cells (assembled with a commercial graphite and SiO anodes), the refinement of the “old-school” electrolyte additive strategy opens up avenues toward the design of practical high-voltage full-cell systems.

Silicon (Si)‐based solid‐state batteries (Si‐SSBs) are attracting tremendous attention because of their high energy density and unprecedented safety, making them become promising candidates for next‐generation energy storage systems. Nevertheless, the commercialization of Si‐SSBs is significantly impeded by enormous challenges including large volume variation, severe interfacial problems, elusive fundamental mechanisms, and unsatisfied electrochemical performance. Besides, some unknown electrochemical processes in Si‐based anode, solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs), and Si‐based anode/SSE interfaces are still needed to be explored, while an in‐depth understanding of solid–solid interfacial chemistry is insufficient in Si‐SSBs. This review aims to summarize the current scientific and technological advances and insights into tackling challenges to promote the deployment of Si‐SSBs. First, the differences between various conventional liquid electrolyte‐dominated Si‐based lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) with Si‐SSBs are discussed. Subsequently, the interfacial mechanical contact model, chemical reaction properties, and charge transfer kinetics (mechanical–chemical kinetics) between Si‐based anode and three different SSEs (inorganic (oxides) SSEs, organic–inorganic composite SSEs, and inorganic (sulfides) SSEs) are systemically reviewed, respectively. Moreover, the progress for promising inorganic (sulfides) SSE‐based Si‐SSBs on the aspects of electrode constitution, three‐dimensional structured electrodes, and external stack pressure is highlighted, respectively. Finally, future research directions and prospects in the development of Si‐SSBs are proposed.