In a double blind, placebo controlled study, propranolol (240 mg), atenolol (200 mg) or bisoprolol (100 mg) were administered as a single oral dose to groups of 6 healthy male volunteers. Exercise tachycardia was monitored for 84 hours after administration of the drugs to monitor beta blockade in vivo. Plasma samples drawn in parallel with these effects were used to detect beta 1- or beta 2-adrenoceptor occupancy in two subtype selective in vitro receptor binding assays. Reduction of exercise tachycardia parallels beta 1-adrenoceptor occupancy. Furthermore, at comparable beta 1-adrenoceptor occupancy, less beta 2-adrenoceptor occupancy was observed after bisoprolol than after atenolol. The latter finding is in agreement with the two-fold higher beta 1/beta 2-selectivity ratio of bisoprolol (75-fold) versus atenolol (35-fold). It is concluded, that beta blockade observed via the reduction of exercise tachycardia can be delineated from the in vitro occupancy of beta 1-adrenoceptors by an antagonist present in plasma samples.
AimsThe pharmacodynamic properties of the angiotensin II antagonist candesartan in humans were assessed from the rightward shifts of angiotensin II dose-effect curves (Schild regression technique). The pharmacokinetic characteristics were determined by radioreceptor assay (r.r.a.) and h.p. ]-angiotensin II). Before and up to 24 h post dosing angiotensin II was infused in ascending dose steps until blood pressure (systolic and/or diastolic) increased by +25 mmHg. Individual angiotensin II dose-effect curves were fitted according to an E max model and dose ratios (DR) calculated from the antagonist induced rightward shifts. Results Candesartan, the active metabolite of candesartan cilexetil, declined from peak concentrations at about 4 h with a t 1/2 of about 6 h. A linear relation (slope 1) between h.p.l.c. and r.r.a. data revealed that there is no other active metabolite. DR at 6-9 h post dosing reached a maximum of about 30 and at 24 h still amounted to 4-7, indicating the persistence of a relevant antagonistic effect in vivo. The apparent K i -doses (derived from Schild regression plots) indicated a high potency (1.9 mg at 24 h) and slow decline of effect. Between plasma concentrations and antagonistic effect a counterclockwise hysteresis was visible. Conclusions A longer persistence of the antagonistic effect at the receptor site than expected by the presence in plasma indicates a slow off-rate of candesartan cilexetil from in vivo receptors. This provides an additional rationale for the observed 24 h therapeutic activity of candesartan cilexetil.
Angiotensin II antagonistic effects of irbesartan, valsartan, and losartan were compared. Irbesartan showed the slowest decay and longest duration of its antagonistic effects. With the recommended initial doses used in this study, the following rank order of antagonistic intensity was obtained: irbesartan > valsartan > losartan. The findings of this study, specifically the longer-lasting effects of irbesartan, may have clinical implications.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril on the elastic properties of the aorta. A standard diuretic antihypertensive drug, hydrochlorothiazide, served for comparisons. Increased aortic stiffness leads to a reduction of the buffering windkessel function and is a major component in the pathophysiology of systolic hypertension, inducing an increase in left ventricular afterload and arterial pulsatile stress as well as a decrease in the subendocardial blood supply. Stiffness of arteries increases with age and blood pressure, and depends on the functional elastic structures of the aortic wall. ACE inhibitors have been shown to directly influence elastic properties of peripheral arteries. Seventeen patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (age 45-67 years) were treated for 3 months double-blind randomized with either cilazapril (C) 5 mg daily (n = 9) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg daily (n = 8). Aortic elastic properties were noninvasively assessed by measurement of pulse wave velocity along the aorta at rest and during isometric handgrip stress. Accelerated pulse wave velocity indicates elevated arterial stiffness and vice versa. A pressure standardized index of aortic cross-sectional distensibility (2 m) was calculated from arterial mean pressure and pulse wave velocity. Compared with pretreatment values, both therapies significantly reduced blood pressure and pulse wave velocity at rest (C: 9.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.7 +/- 0.7 m/sec; HcTZ: 8.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.4 m/sec; means +/- SEM p < 0.05). During isometric stress only C showed a significant decrease in pulse wave velocity (C: 11.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 9.1 +/- 0.8 m/sec; HCTZ: 9.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 9.0 +/- 0.5 m/sec; means +/- SEM p < 0.05). The index 2m at rest and during handgrip increased significantly (p < 0.05) after C but not after HCTZ. With cilazapril we obtained steeper slopes for the treatment-induced reductions in blood pressure and pulse wave velocity for both rest and handgrip stress values. Correlation of the data at rest and during stress revealed a direct relationship between blood pressure and pulse wave velocity. HCTZ linearly extended the relation observed before treatment toward lower values of blood pressure and corresponding pulse wave velocity without changing the relation per se. Cilazapril, in contrast, moved the relation between these variables and decelerated the pulse wave velocities to a greater extent than would have been expected from the corresponding blood pressure reduction (delta approximately 1 m/sec). These results in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension support the idea that ACE inhibitors, in addition to reducing blood pressure, may exert an additional hemodynamic effect in improving the elastic properties of the aorta.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.