The consensus views of an expert roundtable meeting are presented as updated management guidelines for using alemtuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Since the publication of previous management guidelines in 2004, clinical experience with alemtuzumab has grown significantly, especially regarding its efficacy and safety, management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, identification of patient subgroups likely to benefit from alemtuzumab therapy and subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab. The updated recommendations include (1) alemtuzumab monotherapy can be safely used as first-line therapy; (2) suitable patient subgroups for alemtuzumab therapy include elderly patients, patients with 17p deletion, patients with refractory autoimmune cytopenias and patients with profound pancytopenia at baseline due to heavily infiltrated bone marrow; (3) alemtuzumab treatment should be continued for 12 weeks (36 doses) whenever possible, and bone marrow examination may be considered at week 12 to evaluate response; (4) monitoring CMV reactivation by weekly PCR is mandated during therapy; when CMV reactivation becomes symptomatic or viremia increases, alemtuzumab therapy should be interrupted and anti-CMV therapy started; (5) subcutaneous administration is safe, easy to perform and appears equally effective compared with intravenous infusion and (6) our strong recommendation is that alemtuzumab combination therapy and consolidation therapy shall not be used outside carefully controlled clinical studies
Background: Alemtuzumab is the only single agent immunotherapy to demonstrate a survival benefit in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), who have relapsed from or are refractory to Fludarabine therapy. The optimized schedule for alemtuzumab that achieves maximal efficacy with manageable toxicity is still being explored. Here, we report the second interim analysis of a new, less intensive schedule of alemtuzumab administered subcutaneously (SC) to patients with refractory/relapsed B-CLL. Methods: Alemtuzumab was dose escalated from 10 to 20 mg during the first week, 30 mg twice week during the second and third weeks, and 30 mg once weekly during Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 34, and 40. Antiviral prophylaxis included TMP/SMX bid 3 times a week and acyclovir 200 mg three-times daily. Results: Of the 38 patients who were recruited to participate in the trial, 12 (31.6%)were refractory and 26 (68.4%) had relapsed from prior therapy. Patients had a median age of 66.5 years (range, 43–86 years), 30 were male (79%), 45%/53% had Binet stage B/C disease. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1–4). The median duration of therapy was 7 weeks (range, 2–24 weeks), with a median cumulative alemtuzumab dose of 457 mg (range, 120–1,080 mg). Among the 35 patients who were evaluable for response, the overall response rate was 88.6%: 45.8%complete response (CR), 2.9% unconfirmed CR, 42.8% partial response (PR). Four patients ( 11.5%) did not respond to therapy. Of the 9 patients with refractory disease, 1 achieved a CR, 6 a PR and 2 did not respond. Median follow up was 13 months and median overall survival was not achieved. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured by flow cytometry in 6 patients who achieved a CR: 4 patients had <0.5% of CD5/CD19+ cells, 1 patient had <5% of CLL cells, and 1 patient had <10% CLL cells. According to WHO toxicity criteria, over 38 evaluable patients, 4 (10,6%) experienced grade 3/4 infection; 2 patients had grade 2/3 granulocytopenia/thrombocytopenia; 1 patient had cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation without CMV disease; and 1 patient developed Epstein-Barr Virus with prolonged bone marrow hypoplasia. Conclusion: Results of this second interim analysis suggest that a less intense regimen of alemtuzumab is feasible, effective, and safe for patients with refractory/relapse B-CLL after fludarabine therapy.
6600 Background: Alemtuzumab is the only immunotherapy that is effective as a single agent in patients with B-CLL who are refractory to, or who have relapsed after, fludarabine therapy. The optimized schedule for alemtuzumab that achieves maximal efficacy with manageable toxicity is still being explored. We report the first interim analysis of a new, less intensive schedule of alemtuzumab SC to patients with refractory/relapsed B-CLL. Methods: Alemtuzumab was dose escalated from 10 to 20 mg during the first week, 30 mg bid during the second and third weeks, and 30 mg once weekly during weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 34, and 40. Antiviral prophylaxis included TMP/SMX bid 3 times a week and acyclovir 200 mg tid. Results: Patients (N = 36) with refractory (19%) or relapsed (81%) B-CLL had a median age of 67 years (range, 43–86 years), 28 were male, 61%/39% had Binet stage B/C disease, and 2 had B-cell prolymphocytic transformation. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1–4). The median duration of treatment was 7 weeks (range, 2–24 weeks), with a median cumulative alemtuzumab dose of 412 mg (range, 150–1,080 mg). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate of 93%: complete response (CR), 34%; unconfirmed CR, 6%; partial response (PR), 53%. Two patients (7%) did not respond to therapy. Of the 7 refractory patients, 5 had a PR, 1 did not respond, and 1 was not yet evaluable. Median overall survival was 10 months, which correlated with response and pretreatment status. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured by flow cytometry in 5 patients who achieved a CR: 3 patients had <0.5% of CD5/CD19/CD23+ cells, 1 patient had <5% of CLL cells, and 1 patient had <10% CLL cells. According to WHO toxicity criteria, 5 patients experienced grade 3/4 infection; 2 patients had grade 3 granulocytopenia/thrombocytopenia; 1 patient had cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation without CMV disease; and 1 patient developed Epstein-Barr Virus with prolonged bone marrow hypoplasia. Conclusions: Results of this interim analysis suggest that a less intense regimen of alemtuzumab is feasible, effective, and safe for patients with refractory/relapse B-CLL after fludarabine therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.