SUMMARYBackground: Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with standard triple therapy are disappointing, and studies from several countries confirm this poor performance. Aim: To assess the eradication rate of a new sequential treatment regimen compared with conventional triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Methods: One thousand and forty-nine dyspeptic patients were studied prospectively. H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to receive 10-day sequential therapy [rabeprazole (40 mg daily) plus amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days]
Summary
In vitro and in vivo effects of adrenaline (ADR) on platelet aggregation, on platelet factor 3 (PF3) availability and on platelet factor 4 (PF4) release were studied in man. Inhibitory action of an alpha-blocker, phentolamine (PHEN) was investigated in the same conditions.The threshold concentration (TC) of ADR inducing the typical two-phase response in aggregation tests when added to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) varied in different pools of plasma, but always induced an evident PF4 release and increased PF3 availability. A further increase in both parameters was obtained with higher concentrations but without any significant dose/response correlation.Adding PHEN alone to PRP did not induce platelet aggregation or modify PF4 release induced by stirring, but it reduced PF3 availability. On the other hand, PHEN prevented the effects of ADR in different platelet tests, at appropriate concentrations.Intravenous infusion of ADR lowered the TC, and increased PF3 availability and PF4 release. In vivo administration of PHEN, in contrast, increased TC and reduced PF3 availability, while PF4 remained unchanged.
Summary. The changes in coagulability and in fibrinolytic activity induced in local blood by venous stasis in man are not prevented by blocking of alpha‐ and beta‐adrenergic receptors.
Administration of l‐propranolol and of l‐propranolol plus phentolamine in adequate doses just before the execution of a tourniquet test failed to inhibit the major changes, i.e. rise in factor‐VIII level, shortening of partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and euglobulin lysis time (ELT), hypercoagulable pattern on thromboelastogram, following venous stasis. Some other clotting tests remained unchanged in all experimental conditions.
Physiopathological implications of these results are discussed, taking into account the possible role of the adrenergic system in the control of a postulated equilibrium between blood coagulation and fibrinolysis.
An inherited deficiency of antithrombin III (AT III), measured with four different, functional and immunological, methods, was found in 8 out of 11 examined members and in 3 out of 11 examined members of two Italian families (D.M. and A. families). Biological activity, measured with Abildgard’s clotting assay and with an amidolytic method, ranged between 17 and 75%. Cross immunoelectrophoresis, with or without heparin, performed in the two propositi and in 1; other relatives, showed a normal pattern of migration.A different behaviour of AT III after anticoagulation with acenocoumarin was seen in two long-term treated subjects. The proposita of the D.M. family, who had a history of recurrent thrombotic accidents, did not show any increase of AT III levels, measured in the first two weeks and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. A significant (about 50%) increase both with the functional and immunological methods was on the contrary observed in the propositus of A. family, who had undergone surgery because of mesenteric vein thrombosis. Until now both patients have been free of thrombotic recurrences.Our findings confirm previous reports of variable effects of oral anticoagulants on AT III levels in subjects with congenital deficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.