On the basis of this study, a cardiac rehabilitation program tailored to the needs of women appears to be feasible and acceptable. The efficacy of this intervention to improve health-related outcomes needs to be tested in a randomized, controlled trial.
Background Co-morbid depression and anxiety symptoms are frequently under-recognised and under-treated in heart disease and this negatively impacts self-management. Aims The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, correlates and predictors of depression and anxiety in cardiac rehabilitation programmes, the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on moderate depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, and the relationship between moderate depression, anxiety and stress symptoms and cardiac rehabilitation adherence. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 5908 patients entering cardiac rehabilitation programmes from 2006–2017, across two Sydney metropolitan teaching hospitals. Variables included demographics, diagnoses, cardiovascular risk factors, medication use, participation rates, health status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36) and psychological health (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales) subscale scores. Results Moderate depression, anxiety or stress symptoms were prevalent in 18%, 28% and 13% of adults entering cardiac rehabilitation programmes, respectively. Adults with moderate depression (24% vs 13%), anxiety (32% vs 23%) or stress (18% vs 10%) symptoms were significantly less likely to adhere to cardiac rehabilitation compared with those with normal-mild symptoms ( p < 0.001). Anxiety (odds ratio 4.395, 95% confidence interval 3.363–5.744, p < 0.001) and stress (odds ratio 4.527, 95% confidence interval 3.315–6.181, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of depression. Depression (odds ratio 3.167, 95% confidence interval 2.411–4.161) and stress (odds ratio 5.577, 95% confidence interval 4.006–7.765, p < 0.001) increased the risk of anxiety on entry by more than three times, above socio-demographic factors, cardiovascular risk factors, diagnoses and quality of life. Conclusion Monitoring depression and anxiety symptoms on entry and during cardiac rehabilitation can assist to improve adherence and may identify the need for additional psychological health support. Exploring the relevance and use of adjunct psychological support strategies within cardiac rehabilitation programmes is warranted.
Additional linear ablations have been added to WAI in an attempt to improve efficacy, in particular at the left mitral isthmus and left atrial roof. [7][8][9] However, linear ablation can be technically demanding, and conduction recovery across these additional ablation lines is common and associated with recurrences, especially of macroreentrant atrial tachyarrhythmias. 10 Wider isolation techniques are associated with a high incidence of organized atrial © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc. Background-Electric isolation of the pulmonary veins and posterior left atrium with a single ring of radiofrequency lesions (single-ring isolation [SRI]) may result in fewer atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences than wide antral pulmonary vein isolation (wide antral isolation [WAI]) by abolishing extravenous AF triggers. The effect of mitral isthmus line (MIL) ablation on outcomes after SRI has not previously been assessed. Methods and Results-We randomly assigned 220 consecutive patients (58±10 years old; 82% men) with highly symptomatic AF (61% paroxysmal, 39% persistent/longstanding persistent) to undergo either SRI or WAI. Half of each cohort was also randomly allocated to have left lateral MIL ablation (2×2 factorial study design). Patients were followed clinically and with 7-day Holter studies for arrhythmia recurrences. The primary end points were recurrence of AF and organized atrial tachyarrhythmias. AF-free survival at 2 years was better after SRI (74% [95% CI, 65% 10-12 Therefore, an MIL may be effective in reducing OAT recurrences when used with SRI or WAI. However, the efficacy of additional MIL ablation in SRI is unknown. Our second hypothesis was that additional MIL ablation would result in fewer AF and all arrhythmia recurrences compared with no MIL. Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolTo address these hypotheses, a randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of WAI of the pulmonary veins with SRI of the pulmonary veins and the posterior left atrium, with or without additional MIL ablation. MethodsThe study cohort consisted of 220 consecutive patients who were referred for catheter ablation for drug-refractory and highly symptomatic AF. They were block-randomized (1:1) to have either WAI of the pulmonary veins as ipsilateral pairs ( Figure 1A and 1B) or SRI of the posterior left atrium and pulmonary veins ( Figure 1C and 1D). These 2 pulmonary vein isolation techniques have been previously described and are detailed in the online-only Data Supplement.3,10 Within each group, half of the patients were also randomly assigned to have empirical MIL ablation or no MIL ablation unless they had mitral isthmus-dependent flutter during the procedure, resulting in a 2×2 factorial study design.Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, had previous left atrial ablation procedures, or were unable to give informed consent. ProcedureWAI was performed by isolating ipsilateral vein pairs with a ring of ablation lesions ≈5 to 10 mm from the vein ostia ( Figure 1A and 1B). A roofline was also include...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.