A direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for determination of total T-2 toxin metabolites in urine was developed. The assay involves coating anti-3-acetyl-neosolaniol-hemisuccinate- bovine serum albumin conjugate (anti-3-Ac-NEOS-HS-BSA) antibody to the ELISA plate and using 3-Ac-NEOS-HS-peroxidase as the enzyme marker. Competitive ELISA revealed that the antibody had good cross-reactivity with acetyldiacetoxyscirpenol (Ac-DAS), T-2 tetraol tetraacetate, 3'-OH-Ac-T-2, 3-Ac-NEOS, and 3,4,15- triacetyl-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (Ac-T-2-8-one), but less cross-reactivity with Ac-T-2 toxin and T-2 toxin. All metabolites of T-2 toxin in urine were converted to T-2 tetraol tetraacetate (T-2- 4ol-4Ac) by acetylation of the sample extract before ELISA. To test the ELISA accuracy, a radioimmunoassay (RIA) was performed simultaneously. The linear portion of the standard curve of this direct ELISA for T-2-4ol-4Ac was 0.2-2.0 ng/mL, which was 10 times more sensitive than RIA. The minimum detection level for T-2-4ol- 4Ac was 0.02 ng/mL (0.4 pg/assay) in the absence of urine sample. The overall analytical recoveries for T-2 toxin, HT-2, T-2-4ol, 3'- OH-HT-2, NEOS, and a mixture of these 5 toxins added to the urine samples in the ELISA at concentrations of 0.05 and 0.2 ng/mL were 87 and 94%, respectively.
A new approach involving the use of ELISA as a post-column monitoring system for HPLC for the analysis of different group A trichothecenes was developed. Various group A trichothecenes were first separated on a C-18 reverse-phase column. Individual fractions eluted from the column were analyzed by ELISA using generic antibodies against group A trichothecenes. This approach can not only identify each individual group A trichothecene but can also determine their concentration quantitatively. Concentrations as low as 2 ng of T-2 toxin and related trichothecenes as well as their metabolites can be monitored by this method. The combination of HPLC and ELISA technology proved to be an efficient, sensitive and specific method for the analysis of trichothecenes. Details of this approach as tested on the analysis of different group A trichothecenes in some fungal culture extracts and T-2 toxin metabolites in a urine sample are presented. The advantages and disadvantages of this method are discussed.
A simple, rapid enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) was used to evaluate the performance of each step (extraction, filtration, solvent partition, and silica gel column chromatography) of a solvent-efficient thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) method which is undergoing interlaboratory collaborative study for the determination of aflatoxin B1 in corn, raw peanuts, and peanut butter. The apparent average recoveries using the ELISA method were about 30 to 50% higher than those using the TLC method if only the amount of B, added to the samples was used in the calculations. After the cross-reaction of the antibody with other aflatoxins added to the samples was considered, the amounts recovered approached the levels of aflatoxins added in all 3 commodities tested. With no cleanup treatment, ELISA recoveries at aflatoxin B, levels above 7.5 ng/g were 84, 79, and 103% for corn, raw peanuts, and peanut butter, respectively. The coefficients of variation were between 5.2 and 25.2%. With each cleanup step in the TLC method, ELISA detected a progressive decrease in recovery from 150.5 to 105.3% (before correction for the presence of other aflatoxins) or from 93.5 to 65.4% (after correction for other aflatoxins) of B1 added to the samples. The ELISA data support the conclusion obtained from previous studies that cleanup treatments were not necessary in the ELISA. When large amounts of other aflatoxins are present, an understanding of the cross-reactivity of antibody with other aflatoxins in the ELISA is essential for final interpretation of the data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.