This study examined associations between illness representation dimensions specified by the self-regulation model, coping and mood in recently diagnosed gynaecological cancer patients. Participants were 61 patients recruited from a specialist outpatient gynaecology clinic. Patients completed a survey measuring their cognitive illness representations (IPQ-R), coping strategies (COPE) and mood (POMS-SF). Consistent with research into other illnesses, the study found theoretically congruent cross-sectional associations between illness representations and mood disturbance. Support was found for a possible path whereby higher denial and avoidant coping might mediate the relationships between cyclical timeline and illness coherence representations and more negative mood. There were no mediational relationships for other coping strategies. Mediation of the relationship between illness representations and mood by avoidant coping has important theoretical and practical implications. These are discussed, as are direct relationships between illness representations and mood.
Objective. To understand the experiences that people with early psychosis are adjusting to and their perceived barriers to recovery. Method. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with eight participants. Grounded Theory was applied to the design and analysis. Sampling and coding ceased when saturation of the data was reached. Respondent validation was sought from participants. Results. A theoretical model was developed using Strauss and Corbin's (1998) framework. A core category of distress was elicited, which was evident in all participants’ accounts of their recovery. Overall six main categories were identified and it was proposed that individuals were adjusting to the distress of past experiences, uncertainty, a challenged identity, being in a psychiatric system, the reaction of others and social disadvantage. Conclusions. Recovery from the distress and trauma of early psychosis does not simply involve adjustment to and recovery from a single experience or set of symptoms. The results are discussed in relation to trauma, developmental, and social inequality frameworks. Specific implications for clinical practice include incorporating the findings within formulations, developing interventions that focus on trauma, identity, and uncertainty as well as addressing the social and systemic issues identified. Practitioner Points Recovery from early psychosis is multi‐faceted. Psychological formulations should seek to consider individual, social, and systemic factors influencing an individual's distress to more fully conceptualize what an individual's adjustment to early psychosis may involve. Services and wider systems should consider iatrogenic processes, which may contribute to and maintain the distress experienced by those with early psychosis. Education programmes that look to contextualize psychosis within a meaningful framework may help to develop understanding within wider society where a lack of knowledge and understanding serves to reinforce an individual's sense of exclusion and difference.
BACKGROUND Each year in England, almost 10,000 parents are informed of their child’s positive newborn bloodspot screening result around 2-8 weeks after birth, depending on the condition. Communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results is a subtle and skilful task, which demands thought, preparation and evidence to minimise potentially harmful negative sequelae. Evidence exists of variability in the content and the way the result is currently communicated which has the potential to lead to increased parental anxiety and distress. OBJECTIVE The main objective was to co-design interventions to improve delivery of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to families. METHODS The principles of Experience-based Co-design were used with seventeen health care professionals employed in three National Health Service Trusts in England and 21 parents; 13 mothers and 8 fathers of 14 children recruited from the same three National Health Service Trusts. Staff experiences were gathered via semi-structured interviews. Filmed, narrative interviews with parents were developed into a composite film. These data were used to identify priorities for improving communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents during firstly, separate parent and heath care professionals feedback events followed by joint parent and heath care professionals feedback events. Following this, parents and heath care professionals worked together via online co-design working groups to develop co-designed solutions and additions to existing processes. RESULTS Themes identified from the parent’s interviews included: impact of initial communication; parental reactions; attending the first clinic appointment; impact of staff communication strategies and skills; impact of diagnosis on family and friends; improvements to the communication of positive NBS results; and parents views of NBS. Themes identified from the staff interviews included: communication between health care professionals; process of communicating with the family; parent and family- centred care; availability of resources and challenges to effective communication. Three online co-design working groups were developed, each attended by 12-18 participants who had taken part in the parental or health care professionals’ interviews. The priorities included: changes to the NBS card; standardised laboratory proformas; standardised communication checklists; and an email / letter for providing reliable up to date condition specific information for parents following communication of the positive NBS result. CONCLUSIONS Variation in communication practices for positive NBS results continues to exist. This was influenced by many factors and has the potential to lead to negative sequelae from a parental perspective. Parents and health care professionals were able to successfully work together to identify priorities and develop potential solutions to improve communication of positive NBS results to parents. The adaptation of EBCD to include virtual methods could reduce costs associated with this methodology while also enabling the approach to be more responsive to health care professionals’ and patients’/parents’ busy schedules. CLINICALTRIAL ISRCTN 15330120 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.