Surgical site events (SSE), including surgical wound complications and surgical site infections, are a major concern in patients undergoing general surgery operations. These increase the costs of care, and can lead to prolonged hospital stay and need for further treatments, ultimately resulting in poor quality of life. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been recently reported as a preventive strategy to avoid SSE, but little is known on the topic, and particularly in geriatric population. Our primary aim was to assess the efficacy of NPWT by means of a pocket device (PICO, Smith & Nephew, London, UK) in preventing SSE compared with conventional dressings in patients undergoing surgery with primary wound closure for breast and for colorectal diseases in our Unit. Our secondary aims were to assess the efficacy and safety of PICO in elderly patients, and to seek for differences between breast and abdominal results. All consecutive patients undergoing breast and colorectal surgery in our Unit between September 2012 and May 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this open label controlled study. Breast patients receiving NPWT were assigned to group B1, those receiving conventional dressings were assigned to group B2. Colorectal patients were assigned to group C1 (NPWT) and C2 (conventional dressings) in similar fashion. Each group included 25 patients, and at least 10 (40%) patients aged over 65 years to allow sub-analyses. NPWT significantly reduced SSE in both breast and colorectal patients compared with controls. No significant differences were observed according to age. Similar benefits were observed in breast and colorectal patients. Our results suggest that PICO is an effective tool to prevent SSE in patients undergoing general surgery, irrespective of age. Its use is recommended in frail, elderly patients at risk of SSE.
BackgroundThe management of cutaneous metastases often represents a challenge because they may be widespread and may recur after radiotherapy or chemotherapy; breast cancer accounts for 51% of the total cases of cutaneous metastases. When surgical excision of chest wall recurrences is not possible and other local treatments such as radiotherapy or radiotherapy with hyperthermia fail, topical chemotherapy and electrochemotherapy (ECT) might be taken into account.ECT is a new local treatment of solid tumors which can be defined as the local potentiation, by means of permeabilizing electric pulses, of the antitumor activity of a non permeating anticancer drug with high intrinsic cytotoxicity.MethodsThis prospective observational study took place throughout March 2010 to October 2011. Twelve consecutive elderly patients (1 man and 11 women, median age of 76 years) with regional or distant skin or subcutaneous metastases from breast cancer, with or without visceral disease, were included in the study. Patient enrollment was carried out according to the ESOPE criteria. Bleomycin administration was followed by the application of brief electric pulses to each tumor nodule within 8 min after intravenous infusion of the drug. Electric currents were delivered by means of a 2–3 cm long needle electrode according to lesion size. All treatments were performed using the CliniporatorTM device.ResultsWe observed Complete Response(CR) in 75.3% (107 metastases), Partial Response(PR) in 17% (24 metastases), no change in 7.7% (11 metastases) . No serious ECT-related adverse events were reported; adverse events consisted of pain in the treated area one to two days after treatment (1 patient, 8.3%) and ulceration of treated area (1 patient, 8.3%).ConclusionECT could be suggested as a primary local therapy in patients not suitable for surgical removal of the primary tumor, and clinicians should not hesitate to use it even in the elderly.
This study confirms the efficacy of mesh fixation with human fibrin glue, and supports the viability of a sutureless Lichtenstein procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.