Introduction
Evaluation of electrolyte status and homeostasis is one of the most important components of evaluation and treatment of critically ill patients, especially those with multiple trauma. Electrolyte imbalance can be associated with a bad prognosis and the need of specialized consultancy.
Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate and determine the electrolyte status of patients with multiple trauma and evaluate the relationship of electrolyte disorders with patient outcome.
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, 370 patients who were referred to the emergency department of Besat Hospital in Hamadan, Iran with multiple trauma were studied. Demographic parameters clinical characteristics such as blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, consciousness score and body temperature, paraclinical characteristics including radiographic status, ultrasound, and electrocardiography and serum levels of sodium, potassium, creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and BUN and urine analysis was performed. Data regarding the discharge from emergency department or referral to other units were also complete in a questionnaire for each patient. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSSv24.
Results
Three hundred seventy patients with multiple trauma were studied where 73% of patients were men and 27% were women. One hundred ninety‐six patients were discharged from the emergency department, and 174 patients were referred to other units of the hospital. The most common electrolyte abnormalities were hypotension (62.7%), hypernatremia (9.5%), hypokalemia (6.8%), and hypercreatinine (4.6%). The results of independent
t
‐test showed that heart rate and potassium level were significantly higher in patients referred to other units than in patients discharged from the emergency department and respiratory rate and hematocrit were significantly lower in patients referred to other units.
Conclusion
Hypotension, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hypercreatinine, and abnormal urine analysis were more frequent in patients referred to other units than in patients discharged from the emergency department. These variables can be considered in predicting patient status for referral to other units and delayed hospital discharge.
Some studies suggested that helicobacter pylori infection plays a role in the development of nephropathy.
→What this article adds:In children with concomitant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and Helicobacter pylori infection, the treatment of both diseases may accelerate the recovery and decrease the recurrence of nephrotic syndrome.
Introduction: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is considered as the most common urogenital abnormality occurring in children. There is no reliable and routine clinical test that is non-invasive and rapid for recognizing the renal scars from VUR. Objectives: Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) can be the best indicator for early diagnosis of scar formation in children with VUR. Patients and Methods: Children with primary VUR admitted to Hamadan’s Besat hospital from March to December 2020 were included in this cross-sectional study. A dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan was employed to assess all subjects in order to diagnose scar formation at least 180 days after the last episode of urinary tract infection (UTI). Additionally, uNGAL and its ratio to urine creatinine (uCr) levels were measured. Results: During the study, all 63 cases (male/female, 13.50) with VUR were included for further evaluation. The mean age of the patients was 59.1 ± 34.7 months (range 2 to 132 months). Twelve subjects suffered from unilateral VUR, while bilateral VUR inflicted 51. According to the disease severity, nine patients had mild, 35 had moderate, and 19 had a severe form of VUR. No significant difference was observed between patients with (n = 31) and without (n = 32) renal scars regarding mean levels of the uNGAL and uNGAL/uCR ratios (P>0.05). Conclusion: We found no significant difference between the groups with and without the renal scar in terms of biomarker levels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.