Background: Success after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LLIF) partially depends on avoidance of subsidence to maintain spinal alignment, disc space height, and indirect neural decompression. Techniques for preventing subsidence have focused largely on surgical and biomechanical properties of spinal reconstruction; however, medical management may also affect subsidence rates as well. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of alendronate on minimally invasive LLIF patients with regard to radiographic and catastrophic subsidence. Methods: We followed 26 patients who had LLIF at the L4-5 level (13 on alendronate, 13 control) and 22 patients at the L3-4 level (10 on alendronate, 12 control). Radiographs were reviewed to obtain measurements of subsidence at the 4 corners of the cage at 3 follow-up time points (2-3, 5-8, and 10-12 months). A Tobit mixed model was used to confirm the results. Results: We found no relationship between alendronate and subsidence for L3-4 fusion. At L4-5 we observed increased subsidence in the control group compared to the alendronate group (difference ¼ 0.07 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: À0.01, 0.16, P ¼ .08). There was a decrease in subsidence noted for the alendronate group for each time period (differences: 2-3: À0.

Study Design: Cross-sectional observational. Background: The use of social media by providers can enhance patient education, complement offline information, facilitate patient support, stimulate brand building, and strengthen the organization’s market position. Risks of social media include, but are not limited to, a lack of quality, reliability, misrepresentation of credentials, influence of hidden and overt conflicts of interest, content that may jeopardize patient privacy, HIPAA regulations, and physicians’ credentials and licensure. Physicians’ use of social media may also expose him/her to lawsuits if providing specific medical advice on media platforms. Objective: To document the social media presence of a broad cohort of spine surgeons, and to discuss the benefits and risks of a social media presence. Methods: Cross-sectional observational of 325 Spine Surgeons from 76 institutions across the US. Description statistic and Pearson’s correlation were used to investigate the relationships between the variables. Results: Out of the 325 surgeons, 96% were male with an average age of 51.5 ± 10.7 years and 14.1 ± 9.6 years of experience. The frequency of social media use included 57.2% of surgeons had professional LinkedIn, 17.8% had professional Facebook, and less than 16% had other social media platforms. When combining all platforms together, 64.6% of all surgeons had at least one professional social media platform. 64.0% of these surgeons had no social media activity in the past 90 days, while 19.4% and 10.9% were active once and twice a month, respectively. Surgeon age ( P = 0.004), years in practice ( P < 0.001), and practice type ( P < 0.001) were strongly correlated with social media activity. Conclusions: Given the scarcity of research on this topic and the novelty of the platforms, social media and online services continue to be utilized at a low level by spine surgeons. Issues regarding the risks of privacy issues with social media users continue to be a concern among medical professionals adopting this technology. This can largely be mitigated with the combination of physician education and informed consent from patients. The ability to connect with patients directly, and provide access to high-quality education and information will be of considerable benefit to our field well into the future.

Background: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is associated with postoperative dysphagia. It is difficult to predict which patients are most at risk for dysphagia. The objective of this study was to determine if placing an esophageal temperature probe preoperatively would affect the severity and length of postoperative dysphagia. We hypothesize that use of an esophageal temperature probe would result in worse postoperative dysphagia at all measured time points as measured by the Swallowing-Quality of Life (SQAL-QOL) survey after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).Methods: A total of 44 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized controlled trial and randomized into groups: 1 with an esophageal temperature probe placed at the time of surgery and 2 without. A total of 39 patients filled out postoperative SWAL-QOL questionnaires at their preoperatives. Using the survey results, the data were analyzed between groups and subanalyzed based on number of operative levels and sex.Results: SWAL-QOL scores for patients undergoing 2-level ACDF with an esophageal temperature probe were significantly better compared with those without a probe at 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. These results were not significant at other time points in in the overall analysis, but a trend toward improved dysphagia scores at each time point postoperatively was seen with the probe group. No differences were found between the 2 groups with respect to age at the time of surgery, sex, and preoperative SWAL-QOL score.Conclusions: Placement of an esophageal temperature probe at the time of surgery significantly improved postoperative dysphagia scores in patients undergoing 2-level ACDF at 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.Level of Evidence: 2 Clinical Relevance: Placement of a temperature probe is a safe and effective technique that is readily available and easily applicable to the practice of spine surgery and may improve postoperative dysphagia after ACDF.

Symptomatic far-lateral lumbar disc herniation is a less common causes of lumbar radiculopathy than paracentral or central disc herniation. Treatment of far-lateral disc herniation with a retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach and disc fragment excision has been described. However, treatment of far-lateral disc herniation using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) without neural manipulation has not been described. We report one case in which symptom resolution was accomplished via indirect decompression with anterior column support via LLIF without disc fragment excision and review the current literature. The patient noted immediate relief of his preoperative leg pain in the recovery room and ambulation began the same day. Narcotics were effective in treating his incisional pain and mild back pain. The patient was seen two weeks postoperatively and he had stopped all narcotics. At six weeks, the patient continued to have significant improvement and was able to take hour-long walks. At five months, the patient did not have any pain and continued to have improvement in his left quadriceps strength. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion has allowed surgeons to provide both direct and indirect neural decompression through a retroperitoneal approach. This technique may be ideal for far-lateral disc herniation as it also allows a lateral visualization of the herniation without bony, posterior muscular, or ligamentous disruption.

No abstract