L-shell x-ray production cross sections by 0.25 -2.5-MeV 2He ions in 28Ni, »Cu, »Ge, 33AS, 37Rb 3/Sr 3QY, 40Zr, and~Pd axe reported. The data are compared to the first-Born approximation and the ECPSSR theory that accounts for the projectile energy loss (E) and Coulomb deflection (C) as vvell as the perturbed-stationary-state (PSS) and relativistic (R) effects in the treatment of the target I.-sheH electron. Surprisingly, the first Born approximation appears to converge to the data while the ECPSSR predictions underestimate them in the low-velocity limit. This is explained as the result of improper use of single-hole fluorescence yields. A heuristic formula is proposed to account for multiple ionizations in terms of a classical probability for these phenomena and, after it is applied, the ECPSSR theory of I.-shell ionization is found to be in good agreement~ith the data.
The clinical profile of participants aged 75 and older with TTC was different from that of those younger than 75 with TTC, and they had a higher in-hospital complication rate.
M-shell x-ray-production cross sections are reported for lH+ and 2He+ ions incident on thin targets of 79Au, »Pb, 83Bi, and»U. The energy of the ions ranged from 0.3 to 2.6 MeV in increments of 0.1 MeV. The first Born calculations overpredict the data at all energies studied. The perturbed-stationary-state calculations with energy loss, Coulomb deflection, and relativistic effects agree with the present data for both &H+ and 2He+ ions at -0.35 MeV/u, overpredict the data at higher El/A l, and underpredict the data at lower El/Al. The electron-capture contribution to the target ionization is calculated to be less than 3.4%%uo for the targets, projectiles, and energies reported in this work.
L-shell X-ray production cross sections for 29Cu, 31Ga, 32Ge, 35Br, 39Y, 42Mo, 47Ag, 50Sn, 57La, 60Nd, 64Gd, 67Ho, 70Yb, 79Au and 82Pb were measured for carbon ions in the 2-12 MeV energy range. The copper to yttrium data were previously measured using a Si(Li) detector with a beryllium window, while the molybdenum to lead X-rays were counted with a windowless Si(Li) detector, whose efficiency was determined by various normalization techniques. The measured X-ray cross sections are compared to predicted X-ray cross sections from the first Born and the ECPSSR theories. Using single-hole fluorescence yields, at low projectile velocities the first Born approximation overpredicts the data by as much as one order of magnitude while the ECPSSR theory at worse underestimates the data by about a factor of four. For the highest projectile velocities relative to target L-shell electrons, both theories converge toward the data to almost within experimental uncertainties. After modifying the fluorescence yield to account for multiple outer-shell ionization, the ECPSSR theory is brought into better agreement with the data for light targets but still overestimates the data for heavier targets. Also, the 2 MeV measurements using doubly ionized carbon ions are still significantly underestimated by the ECPSSR theory even after accounting for multiple ionization. Our multiple ionization correction assumes that the target foil thickness is thin enough to insure single collision conditions. However, in order to obtain acceptable signal-to-noise ratios, the target foils used in this experiment were too thick to provide single collision conditions. For thicker foils, ions are stripped inside the target resulting in an appreciable fraction of higher charge states that enhance the ionization of outer shells and the effective fluorescence yields. This effect could account for the remaining discrepancy between the ECPSSR theory and the data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.