In the current legal context, the discussion about aspects concerning the conditions of the Brazilian penitentiary system persists in contrast to the fundamental rights of incarcerated women, both in general and in their specific properties. In this sense, the objective of this article was to examine the concept and origin of the prison system, the penalty and the rights of the incarcerated individual, and how they are realized in the Brazilian social environment, aiming, with this, to understand the legal aspects related to the rights of the prisoner. imprisoned women and, finally, the specific factors about women in the prison system. In this perspective, the present article, by means of exploratory research, of qualitative nature, deductive method, collection of documental and bibliographic data, was developed in order to carry out a historical investigation on the theme, reaching the result that, although there are many advances regarding the fundamental guarantees provided to female citizens in Brazil, challenges, not only within the scope of Criminal Law, to be overcome for these people to fully exercise their human dignity.
Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.
Editora Direitos para esta edição cedidos à Atena Editora pelos autores. Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, inclusive não representam necessariamente a posição oficial da Atena Editora. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais. A Atena Editora não se responsabiliza por eventuais mudanças ocorridas nos endereços convencionais ou eletrônicos citados nesta obra. Todos os manuscritos foram previamente submetidos à avaliação cega pelos pares, membros do Conselho Editorial desta Editora, tendo sido aprovados para a publicação.
With the enactment of the Constitution of 1988, many of the arbitrary determinations of Institutional Act number 5 were contrasted by the inclusion of fundamental rights within the stone clauses. In this sense, the objective of this article is to investigate the extent to which the nation's re-democratization process was able to reward Brazilian society with regard to the historical debt caused by military intervention and the implementation of AI-5. In this perspective, the present article, through exploratory research, of qualitative nature, deductive method, collection of documental and bibliographic data, developed in order to carry out a historical investigation on the theme, reaching the result that, although the The process has been largely successful, there are still gaps in the Federal Constitution that allow rules and decrees similar to the Institutional Acts to be enacted, as well as laws that guarantee fundamental rights to be disregarded. Finally, it was concluded that there is still an urgent need to protect human rights in the Constitutional Text, since the aforementioned inconsistencies do not guarantee the full preservation of fundamental guarantees.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.