Background Evidence supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in improving efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on perceptions and barriers to TDM use are limited and no data are available from India. Our objective was to assess clinicians' attitudes and barriers to TDM use in IBD. Methods A 16-question survey was distributed to members of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Information on clinician characteristics, demographics, use and barriers towards TDM with anti-TNFs was collected. Logistic regression was used to predict factors influencing TDM use. Results Two hundred and forty-two respondents participated (92.5% male); 83% were consultant gastroenterologists. Of 104 respondents meeting inclusion criteria (treating > 5 IBD patients and at least 1 with an anti-TNF per month), complete responses were available for 101 participants. TDM was utilized by 20% (n = 20) of respondents. Of them, 89.5% (n = 17) used TDM for secondary loss of response; 73.7% (n = 14) for primary non-response and 5.3% (n = 1) proactively. Barriers to TDM use were cost (71.2%), availability (67.8%), time lag in results (58.7%) and the perception that TDM is time-consuming (45.7%). Clinicians treating > 30 IBD patients were more likely to check TDM (OR = 4.9, p = 0.02). Of 81 respondents not using TDM, 97.5% (n = 79) would do so if all the barriers were removed. Conclusion Significant barriers to TDM use were availability, cost and time lag for results. If these barriers were removed, almost all the clinicians would use TDM at least reactively and 25% would use proactively. There is an urgent need to address these barriers and optimize anti-TNF therapy for optimal outcomes.

No abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed a serious threat to global public health with its rapid spread, high fatality, and severe burden on health care providers all over the world. Although COVID-19 has been established as a respiratory tract infection, it can manifest with gastrointestinal symptoms as a consequence of direct infection by the virus or due to inflammation-mediated cytotoxicity. It has been observed that COVID-19 patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms tend to progress to a severe form of disease with increased morbidity and mortality, thus indicating the need for timely management. COVID-19 manifests with a wide spectrum of radiologic findings on gastrointestinal tract imaging, encompassing bowel abnormalities, hepato-biliary and pancreatic involvement, vascular occlusion, and solid organ infarction. Early recognition of these imaging features can facilitate timely treatment of COVID-19 associated gastrointestinal tract complications and may prompt the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with atypical disease manifestations. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the various gastrointestinal imaging manifestations that can be encountered in patients with COVID-19, with an emphasis on early diagnosis of the disease as well as treatment related complications.

BACKGROUND Compared with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been shown to have good agreement in cardiac output (CO) measurement in nonsurgical populations. Our hypothesis is that the feasibility and accuracy of CO measured by TTE (CO-TTE), relative to CO measured by PAC thermodilution (CO-PAC), is different in surgical intensive care unit patients (SP) and nonsurgical patients (NSP). METHODS Surgical patients with PAC for hemodynamic monitoring and NSP undergoing right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled. Cardiac output was measured by CO-PAC and CO-TTE. Pearson coefficients were used to assess correlation. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine agreement. RESULTS Over 18 months, 84 patients were enrolled (51 SP, 33 NSP). Cardiac output TTE could be measured in 65% (33/51) of SP versus 79% (26/33) of NSP; p = 0.17. Inability to measure the left ventricular outflow tract diameter was the primary reason for failure in both groups; 94% (17/18) in SP versus 86% (6/7) NSP; p = 0.47. Velocity time integral could be measured in all patients. In both groups, correlation between PAC and TTE measurement was strong; SP (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001), NSP (r = 0.86; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated bias of −0.1 L/min, limits of agreement of −2.5 and +2.3 L/min, percentage error (PE) of 40% for SP, and bias of +0.4 L/min, limits of agreement of −1.8 and +2.5 L/min, and PE of 40% for NSP. CONCLUSION There was strong correlation and moderate agreement between TTE and PAC in both SP and NSP. In both patient populations, inability to measure the left ventricular outflow tract diameter was a limiting factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic tests or criteria, level III.

We present a patient with an acute kidney injury thought secondary to acute interstitial nephritis as a result of vedolizumab maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. This appears to be a rare but serious side effect in patients receiving this treatment which clinicians should consider in the event of renal dysfunction.