No abstract

Members of the teleost family Syngnathidae (seahorses, pipefishes and seadragons) (Extended Data Fig. 1), comprising approximately 300 species, display a complex array of morphological innovations and reproductive behaviours. This includes specialized morphological phenotypes such as an elongated snout with a small terminal mouth, fused jaws, absent pelvic and caudal fins, and an extended body covered with an armour of bony plates instead of scales 1 (Fig. 1a). Syngnathids are also unique among vertebrates due to their 'male pregnancy' , whereby males nourish developing embryos in a brood pouch until hatching and parturition occurs 2,3 . In addition, members of the subfamily Hippocampinae (seahorses) exhibit other derived features such as the lack of a caudal fin, a characteristic prehensile tail, and a vertical body axis 4 (Fig. 1a). To understand the genetic basis of the specialized morphology and reproductive system of seahorses, we sequenced the genome of the tiger tail seahorse, H. comes, and carried out comparative genomic analyses with the genome sequences of other ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii). Genome assembly and annotationThe genome of a male H. comes individual was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. After filtering low-quality and duplicate reads, 132.13 Gb (approximately 190-fold coverage of the estimated 695 Mb genome) of reads from libraries with insert sizes ranging from 170 bp to 20 kb were retained for assembly. The filtered reads were assembled using SOAPdenovo (version 2.04) to yield a 501.6 Mb assembly with an N50 contig size and N50 scaffold size of 34.7 kb and 1.8 Mb, respectively. Total RNA from combined soft tissues of H. comes was sequenced using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and assembled de novo. The H. comes genome assembly is of high quality, as > 99% of the de novo assembled transcripts (76,757 out of 77,040) could be mapped to the assembly; and 243 out of 248 core eukaryotic genes mapping approach (CEGMA) genes are complete in the assembly.We predicted 23,458 genes in the genome of H. comes based on homology and by mapping the RNA-seq data of H. comes and a closely related species, the lined seahorse, Hippocampus erectus, to the genome assembly (see Methods and Supplementary Information). More than 97% of the predicted genes (22,941 genes) either have homologues in public databases (Swissprot, Trembl and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)) or are supported by assembled RNAseq transcripts. Analysis of gene family evolution using a maximum likelihood framework identified an expansion of 25 gene families (261 genes; 1.11%) and contraction of 54 families (96 genes; 0.41%) in the H. comes lineage (Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Tables 4.1, 4.2). Transposable elements comprise around 24.8% (124.5 Mb) of the H. comes genome, with class II DNA transposons being the most abundant class (9%; 45 Mb). Only one wave of transposable element expansion was identified, with no evidence for a recent transposable element burst (Kimura divergence ≤ 5) (Extended D...

There is increasing evidence that phenotypic plasticity can promote population divergence by facilitating phenotypic diversification and, eventually, genetic divergence. When a 'plastic' population colonizes a new habitat, it has the possibility to occupy multiple niches by expressing several distinct phenotypes. These initially reflect the population's plastic range but may later become genetically fixed by selection via the process of 'genetic assimilation' (GA). Through this process multiple specialized sister lineages can arise that share a common plastic ancestor - the 'flexible stem'. Here, we review possible molecular mechanisms through which natural selection could fix an initially plastic trait during GA. These mechanisms could also explain how GA may contribute to cryptic genetic variation that can subsequently be coopted into other phenotypes or traits, but also lead to nonadaptive responses. We outline the predicted patterns of genetic and transcriptional divergence accompanying flexible stem radiations. The analysis of such patterns of (retained) adaptive and nonadaptive plastic responses within and across radiating lineages can inform on the state of ongoing GA. We conclude that, depending on the stability of the environment, the molecular architecture underlying plastic traits can facilitate diversification, followed by fixation and consolidation of an adaptive phenotype and degeneration of nonadaptive ones. Additionally, the process of GA may increase the cryptic genetic variation of populations, which on one hand may serve as substrate for evolution, but on another may be responsible for nonadaptive responses that consolidate local allopatry and thus reproductive isolation.

Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of organisms with a given genotype to develop different phenotypes according to environmental stimuli, resulting in individuals that are better adapted to local conditions. In spite of their ecological importance, the developmental regulatory networks underlying plastic phenotypes often remain uncharacterized. We examined the regulatory basis of diet-induced plasticity in the lower pharyngeal jaw (LPJ) of the cichlid fish Astatoreochromis alluaudi, a model species in the study of adaptive plasticity. Through raising juvenile A. alluaudi on either a hard or soft diet (hard-shelled or pulverized snails) for between 1 and 8 months, we gained insight into the temporal regulation of 19 previously identified candidate genes during the early stages of plasticity development. Plasticity in LPJ morphology was first detected between 3 and 5 months of diet treatment. The candidate genes, belonging to various functional categories, displayed dynamic expression patterns that consistently preceded the onset of morphological divergence and putatively contribute to the initiation of the plastic phenotypes. Within functional categories, we observed striking co-expression, and transcription factor binding site analysis was used to examine the prospective basis of their coregulation. We propose a regulatory network of LPJ plasticity in cichlids, presenting evidence for regulatory crosstalk between bone and muscle tissues, which putatively facilitates the development of this highly integrated trait. Through incorporating a developmental time-course into a phenotypic plasticity study, we have identified an interconnected, environmentally responsive regulatory network that shapes the development of plasticity in a key innovation of East African cichlids.

BackgroundThe experimental approach to the evolution and development of the vertebrate skeleton has to a large extent relied on “direct-developing” amniote model organisms, such as the mouse and the chicken. These organisms can however only be partially informative where it concerns secondarily lost features or anatomical novelties not present in their lineages. The widely used anamniotes Xenopus and zebrafish are “indirect-developing” organisms that proceed through an extended time as free-living larvae, before adopting many aspects of their adult morphology, complicating experiments at these stages, and increasing the risk for lethal pleiotropic effects using genetic strategies.ResultsHere, we provide a detailed description of the development of the osteology of the African mouthbrooding cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni, primarily focusing on the trunk (spinal column, ribs and epicentrals) and the appendicular skeleton (pectoral, pelvic, dorsal, anal, caudal fins and scales), and to a lesser extent on the cranium. We show that this species has an extremely “direct” mode of development, attains an adult body plan within 2 weeks after fertilization while living off its yolk supply only, and does not pass through a prolonged larval period.ConclusionsAs husbandry of this species is easy, generation time is short, and the species is amenable to genetic targeting strategies through microinjection, we suggest that the use of this direct-developing cichlid will provide a valuable model system for the study of the vertebrate body plan, particularly where it concerns the evolution and development of fish or teleost specific traits. Based on our results we comment on the development of the homocercal caudal fin, on shared ontogenetic patterns between pectoral and pelvic girdles, and on the evolution of fin spines as novelty in acanthomorph fishes. We discuss the differences between “direct” and “indirect” developing actinopterygians using a comparison between zebrafish and A. burtoni development.