Dr. Saikat Sarkar (BS Medical College) was also contributed during the study, therefore, the title needed to be revised along with inclusion of his name as he was also a part of the project during that time period.

Background:Femoral shaft fracture is the most common major paediatric orthopaedic. For generations traction and casting was the standard treatment for all femoral shaft fractures in children. Over the past two decades the advantages of fixation and rapid mobilisation have been increasingly recognised.Methods:A prospective study was conducted in five private hospitals in the district of Bankura, West Bengal over a period of two years (April 2010 to March 2012) on 70 patients with closed shaft femur fractures between 6- 14 years age of either sex. The aim was to find out the short term complications of titanium elastic nailing in diaphyseal fracture of femur in children and compare the findings of this study with pre- existing studies in this field.Results:In our study the most common complication was pain at nail entry site (60%). 5.71% had local inflammatory reaction due to nails. Superficial infection occurred in 2.85%. At the end of 1 year, 2.85% had limb length discripancies. Proximal migration occurred in 2.85%. 2.85% encountered acute reactive synovitis, 5.71% developed angulation of fracture site and 2.85% developed per operative breakage of nail.Conclusion:The treatment of paediatric shaft femur fracture has been drastically changed over the last two decades to internal fixation by elastically stable intra- medullary nail (ESIN). In our study, we encountered only a few complications most of them being minor. Most of the complications were surgical technique related and were seen at the initial phase of the learning curve.

Tuberculous infection of metacarpals, metatarsals and phalanges is known as tuberculous dactylitis. There is a spindle shaped expansion of the short tubular bones due to tuberculous granuloma. Hence it is also known as spina ventosa. In our case, a two year old boy with a swelling in the metacarpal was provisionally diagnosed as enchondromata while the possibility of spina ventosa was kept in mind. He was posted for excision of the metacarpal followed by bone grafting. Histopathological examination report confirmed it as spina ventosa.

Background: Fracture of distal radius with involvement of the ulnar styloid process is a common clinical problem. It can be treated conservatively, usually involving wrist immobilization in plaster cast or surgically. A key method of surgical fixation is external fixation by distractor. Distractor can be applied either only on the radial side or on both ulnar and radial sides. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized and comparative study of 1 year duration was conducted on 32 patients admitted in the Department of Orthopaedics of BSMC & H in the age group of 20 to 75 years old with AO types B and C distal radius fracture along with involvement of the ulnar styloid process. The parameters studied were restoration of radial length, restoration of radial angle, intracarpal step-off and palmar tilt which were statistically evaluated and Fisher's exact test was performed. The two tailed P-value was calculated and both the groups were statistically compared. Results: In our study, 37.5% patients in Group A and 81.25% in Group B had a radial difference <3 mm which was statistically significant (Table 1, Chart 1). 43.75% patients in Group A and 87.5% in Group B had radial angle <5' which was significant (Table 2, Chart 2). 31.25% in Group A and 75% had intra carpal step off <2 mm which was again statistically significant (Table 3, Chart 3). 62.5% had an abnormal palmar tilt in Group A while only 6.25% had an abnormal palmar tilt in Group B which is extremely statistically significant. On an average, 2 mm of distraction was required in 75% patients of Group A while only 30% patients in Group B required distraction (Table 4, Chart 4). Conclusion: In our study, the radial difference, radial angle, intra carpal step off and palmar tilt returned significantly to normal in the patients treated with distractor on radial side only when compared with distractor application on both radial and ulnar sides for distal radius fracture with ulnar styloid process involvement. Also post-operative distraction required under image intensifier was higher in the group treated with distractor on either side than those with distractor only on radial side.

Osteosarcoma is a tumour characterized by the production of osteoid by malignant cells. The incidence is approximately 1 to 3 million/year. The incidence is slightly higher in males. Onset can occur at any age; however, primary high grade osteosarcoma usually occurs in the second decade of life. Historically patients with osteosarcoma were treated with immediate wide or radical amputation. Despite the treatment, 80% patients with apparently isolated disease died of distant metastases. In recent years the number of patients with osteosarcoma of the limb treated by amputation + chemotherapy has increased. In our study, we divided the patients into two groups. One group (A) was treated with amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy. The other group (B) was treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy + amputation followed by adjuvant-chemotherapy. In our study, the margin negativity in post surgical specimen was significantly higher (P-value 0.0007) for the group treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Local recurrence in the group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more (P-value 0.0005). The systemic recurrence at the end of 6 months was higher the group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P-value 0.0169). However systemic recurrence between 6 months -1 year and 1 year -2 years were not significant (P-values 0.1501 and 0.4902). From the above figures it may be concluded that treatment with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy + amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy had definite advantages over upfront amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy.