Objective: Diabetic dyslipidemia is highly atherogenic as it is associated with high triglyceride (TG), high small dense low-density lipoprotein (sd-LDL) particles and low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C). Saroglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor agonist (predominant PPAR-α agonist and modest PPAR-γ agonist), is approved in India for the management of diabetic dyslipidemia. The GLIDDER study was done to evaluate the effects of Saroglitazar 4 mg on non HDL-C as the primary endpoint and sd-LDL particles as a secondary endpoint in diabetic patients with dyslipidemia. Methods: This study was a 24 weeks, prospective, multicentre, single arm study conducted in 104 patients with diabetic dyslipidemia (TG ≥ 200 mg/dL) inadequately controlled with diet, exercise, and statins. It was conducted from April 2015 to November 2017 at three Indian centres. All the selected patients were given Saroglitazar 4 mg once daily before breakfast for 24 weeks. Efficacy evaluations of non HDL-C (calculated as Total Cholesterol (TC) minus HDL-C) (primary endpoint) and other lipid parameters (sd-LDL particles, TC, TG, HDL-C) and glycemic parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG)) were conducted after 24 weeks and compared to the baseline levels. Results: Total 104 patients (22% female) with mean age of 59.1 ± 11.4 years were enrolled in this study. In the perprotocol population, there was a significant reduction in non HDL-C (from 142.3 ± 59.3 mg/dL (baseline) to 109.9 ± 45.5 mg/dL (week-24); p<0.0001) and sd-LDL (from 32.5 ± 11.3 mg/dL (baseline) to 25.9 ± 11.8 mg/dL (week-24); p<0.0001). There was a significant reduction in TG, TC, HbA1c, and FPG with a significant increase in HDL-C at week-24 from baseline levels (p<0.05). Conclusion: Saroglitazar effectively reduces non HDL-C and sd-LDL particles in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia.

No abstract

Aims. Left distal transradial arterial approach (ldTRA) is a new interventional route that spares right radial artery (RRA) for use in haemodialysis and as bypass graft. Vasant Kunj Left dIstal Transradial ArtEry approach (VKLITE) study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of ldTRA access during coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results. Between April 2018 and June 2020, 108 patients were enrolled and underwent CAG ± PCI via ultrasound guided ldTRA. Arterial puncture, CAG, and PCI were successful in 96.3% (104/108), 92.1% (93/101), and 94.1% (32/34) patients, respectively. Access site crossover rate was 14/108 (13.0%). Mean puncture, procedure, and haemostasis time (minutes) were 6.7 ± 7.1, 55.7 ± 32.8, and 23.1 ± 11.9. Median total fluoroscopic time was 6.6 minutes (IQR-14.2), and median total radiation dose was 39.2 Gy-cm2 (IQR-97.0). Local haematoma occurred in 11 patients (10.2%) with major haematoma in 1.9%, all recovering within three weeks. Mean pain score was 2.4 ± 2.3, and patient satisfaction score was 9.0 ± 1.3. LdTRA access compared with RRA access (n = 121) showed significantly increased mean procedure time (55.7 ± 32.8 vs. 43.9 ± 26.0 minutes, p = 0.01) and median total fluoroscopic time (6.6 [IQR-14.2] vs. 4.7 [IQR-8.2] minutes, p = 0.02), with similar median total radiation dose (39.2 [IQR-97.0] vs. 43.8 [IQR-54.5] Gy-cm2, p = 0.56). No radial artery loss, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or nerve injury was noted. Conclusions. LdTRA access is feasible with few complications during CAG/PCI. Patient comfort and satisfaction makes it a desirable route for coronary interventions.

No abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare entity. It has been described in various settings like pregnancy, collagen vascular diseases, cocaine abuse, heavy exercise, variant angina, eosinophilic arteritis, or fibro muscular dysplasia. It is also easy to miss a dissection during angiography, as the typical radiolucent lumen seen in coronary angiography may be absent in many cases. In this report, we describe the case of a 35-year-old female who presented with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary dissection. She had been having episodic chest pain for one year and had been seen by two different cardiologists but was thought to have non-cardiac symptoms. Even during the index hospitalization, she underwent coronary angiography three times before coronary dissection could be identified as the cause of her symptoms. She underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery uneventfully. However, even after myocardial revascularization, she has had multiple episodes of chest pain requiring hospitalization. However, we have not been able to find a specific cause for it and the cause of her recurrent chest pain remains an enigma. This case highlights the problems, which arise while managing a case of SCAD. More research is needed to find the exact etiology and long-term prognosis of this condition.