The article first examines the contrast between popular remembering and the official presentation of Yugoslav socialist past in Slovenia. We examine the discursive patterns in political dignitaries’ declarations and reconstruct popular remembering as it emerges from the existing research. We focus on theories that conceptualize positive popular attitudes towards socialist past with the notion of ‘nostalgia’. Following the ways how researchers overcome the difficulties of the ‘Yugonostalgia’ approach, we note that they do not take into account the embeddedness of the positive achievements of socialism into the overall fabric of socialist system. According to our hypothesis, this omission induces the researchers to overestimate the present social and political impact of positive attitudes to socialist past. Furthermore, social struggles in which researchers are engaged seem to raise barriers to scientific practice. This study attempts to contribute to the project of Yugoslav memory studies.
Starting from recent formulas of EU bureaucracy for subordinating scientific
and educational apparatuses to the needs of the capital and to the requests
of its political representatives, the article analyses the interconnection
between the historical transformation of the ideological state apparatuses
(universities, higher education institutions, research institutes etc.) and
the epistemological discontinuity provoked by the triumph of technosciences.
The hypothesis to be tested is the following: While the crisis of West
European-North American capitalism requires an ever tighter submission of
ideological state apparatuses, and especially of scientific and academic
apparatuses to the needs of the capital, theoretical practices in the
humanities and social sciences have come to the point where they entered into
an open conflict with the domination of the capital and have, as a
consequence, started to subvert their own institutional supports in the
ideological apparatuses of the capitalist state. For this purpose, the
article reconsiders social sciences as a compromise formation and,
eventually, reassesses the historical materialism as a non-Cartesian modern
science.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.