This research is aimed to know the effect of learning method"s towards Arabic Achievement of the Fifth Grade Students of Islamic Elementary School Pembangunan Islamic State University Sharif Hidayatullah Jakarta 2009/2010. The research questions were: is there any difference in Arabic learning achievement as a whole between a group of students who have been given intiqâiyyah methods and another group of students who have been given conventional methods. This research was an experimental study using randomized control group design. The influencing factorial variable are learning methods on Arabic. The Arabic learning achievement was used to know the students" skill or capability Arabic learning. In experimental class, intiqâiyyah methods as experiment methods, and conventional methods as control methods. This research concluded that there was any difference between students Arabic achievements of group of students who have been given intiqâiyyah methods and group of students who have been given conventional methods.

This study aims to develop an "Arabic morphological simplification model with a constructivism approach and the analogy of learning sharf in Fast Time." The research approach used is qualitative and quantitative types of development research (RD). Researchers will develop an Arabic morphological model that can make neural learning successful in this fast time through surveys, interviews, documentation studies, and FGDs. It found that model was developed has succeeded in learning. Arabic education experts provide positive support to continue developing Arabic morphology models based on constructivism and analogy. Many inputs are used as references for researchers in developing the model designs that have been made. In the next stage, students as objects and public test subjects feel that neural learning becomes meaningful. Students also get a new, productive, and accessible learning model, even for those who are very 'basic,' who have always been seen as having difficulty mastering nerves.

This article approach uses qualitative methods with descriptive data collection techniques from literature studies. The data analysis technique uses the Seidel model by going through several stages of the process, namely identifying the collected data by means of data clarification, licensing, analysis, and data categorization. The discussion includes the meaning and differences between measurement, assessment, evaluation as well as the purpose and function of evaluation in Arabic language learning based on a review of educational administration. The three terms have different meanings but are interrelated with each other. The activity of comparing certain criteria to the results of observations is called measurement. Self-assessment means the process of collecting data by measuring, interpreting, describing, and interpreting some evidence of information from the measurement results. Meanwhile, evaluation is an advanced process of measurement and assessment data. The evaluation objectives to be achieved are determined by the evaluation function itself, which is divided into an instructional evaluation function, an administrative evaluation function, and a guidance evaluation function. The purpose and function of evaluation in the learning process go hand in hand, namely to obtain accurate information or data related to the level of achievement of student competencies in accordance with the instructional objectives or indicators formulated.

As well as other learning process, the successful Arabic learning can be achieved through several steps. This study aims to explain those steps, and it uses library research. Method of this study covers finding data and sources related to the contrastive analysis in Arabic learning; analyzing the data as well as the sources; and drawing conclusion. The approach used in the learning process can be categorized as a learning difficult foreign language, if it is considered as the perspective in understanding the material. The difficult language is particularly the one that has different systems/subsystems with mother tongue. On the other hand, if the approach is considered as a belief, the successful key to achieve is the use of contrastive analysis. We have to work hard to overcome students' learning difficulties by doing contrastive approach and analysis firstly. However, the most significant part is the goal using contrastive analysis. As the result of this study, hopefully learning Arabic occurs progressively, and absolutely the teaching materials and learning steps need teachers’ ability in mastering the contrasted languages. That is the main factor in achieving the learning to be developed further in using this approach.

This paper aims to uncover tests quality on the National Standard Madrasah Final Examination academic year 2012/2013 on the level of Madrasah Aliyah in Indonesia. Quality means qualitative and quantitative term. Qualitative analysis is done by critical reading, doing discussions and making manual form of multiple choice questions in Arabic. The study concluded that the quality of a qualitative test is still very low, many mistakes in making questions are found, such as writing numbers in arabic, and spreading the correct answer is not balanced. From the aspect of test coverage, in National Standard Madrasah Final Examination, there is no problem with regarding the listening comprehension and many questions that are not contextualized with the actual context of the Arabic language.