Even though international travel restrictions are being used to keep the COVID-19 pandemic under control, these measures cannot be considered as long-term solutions to the ongoing crisis. Limitations on traveling activities have tremendous adverse consequences on a country’s economy, particularly leading in radically expanding economic downturn and a shrinking tourism industry. To overcome this hardship, several countries have eased COVID-19 travel restrictions. However, there are still questions concerning the benefit to society as the impact assessment of this implementation transmitting to an economy has not been explicitly investigated. In response to this, we aim to assess the impacts of this implementation as to provide a guideline to global countries for their future adoption. By calculating the output and household income multipliers from the tourism input–output table, this study utilizes a case study from Thailand to indicate that prolonging the full mobility restrictions of international tourists, which results in a yearly loss of revenue in Thai tourism industry, would cost country production up to 144.97 billion USD and up to 45.4 billion USD for loss of household income. When international travel limitations were relaxed, production and household damage would fall to 142.24 billion USD (+1.88%) and 44.7 billion USD (+1.54%), respectively. At individual sectors level, our calculation identified that the most damage of production activities would exist in public utility, agriculture, and food manufacturing sectors. In the perspective of household income, those in the agricultural sector would have greatest impact. This impact results from the Thai tourism industry positioned as a buyer in an economy, having most impact on sectors selling their products or inputs to the tourism industry. As suggested by the input–output multipliers, we emphasize that strengthening the resilience of tourism-related sectors and reforming the tourism industry in relation to potential consumption and production patterns are critical for sustainable tourism development.
Sur le plan historique, la production de raisin de cuve était limitée aux latitudes tempérées, en grande partie entre 30 et 50 degrés au-dessus et au-dessous de l'Equateur. Cependant, on assiste depuis peu à sa fabrication dans les pays des régions tropicales. Cet article analyse le développement et les caractéristiques de l'industrie vinicole thaïe, la plus importante des pays de l’Asie du Sud-Est. En le rattachant aux débats sur la mondialisation économique et culturelle, il étudie les motivations et les origines des producteurs thaïs, les contraintes environnementales, les adaptations locales ainsi que les contraintes réglementaires et culturelles au développement de cette industrie, ses liens mondiaux et ses perspectives. Notre argument est qu’en dépit de sa de petite taille, l'industrie vinicole thaïe intègre nettement nombre des complexités de la mondialisation, démontrant ainsi la fusion des tendances culturelles mondiales, la croissance économique nationaliste, la nature de plus en plus globale des acteurs de l’industrie vinicole ainsi que les contraintes permanentes exercées par le processus de mondialisation sur l’ensemble de ces régimes politiques internes et réglementaires.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.