Objectives: The aim of this report is to present a case of florid osseous dysplasia and understand its characteristics from panoramic radiography. Case Report: A 47-years-old female patient came to the oral and maxillofacial radiology department at Dental and Oral Hospital of Universitas Padjadjaran to take panoramic radiography. Patient’s chief complaints were pain on tooth 46 after being extracted about 4 days ago with numbness on the extraction area. Panoramic radiograph showed radioopaque lesions in the extraction area surrounded by a thin radiolucent area. In the periapical region of tooth 36 and 47 showed the same radiopaque image as tooth 46. The radiodiagnostic suspect of the lesions was bilateral florid osseous dysplasia in the posterior region of the mandible. Conclusion: The images of florid osseous dysplasia from panoramic radiography are radioopaque, well-defined, sclerotic border, and having soft tissue capsule when the lesion is  immature condition. The most common condition of FOD affect both upper and lower jaw, but if the lesion only occur in one jaw, the lesion commonly happen in mandible with exact location is more posterior than  canine teeth.

Objectives: To view a case report of mandibular ossifying fibroma (OF) in pediatric male. Case Report: A 12 year old child came to RSHS with a panoramic radiograph with the chief complaint of swelling in the right mandible. Panoramic radiograph shows well-defined mixed lesions with radiolucent content and snowflake-like opaque. MDCT shows a superior-inferior and bucco-lingual extension of the lesion. The suspicion of this case leads to Ossifying Fibroma with differential diagnosis of Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor (AOT) and Calcifiying Ephitelial Odontogenic Tumor (CEOT). Conclusion: OF cases in children, especially mandibular, are very rare, where the characteristics of the lesion can be well defined through the help of panoramic radiographs and MDCT. OF is a lesion that has benign characteristics with well-defined borders, and the most important lies in the presence of wrapping capsules and mixed internal structures accompanied by snowflake-like calcification.

Objective. This research aimed to analyze the differences in bone density and bone morphometry by periapical implant radiography in the dental implant osseointegration stages. Methods. This experimental research uses 12 periapical radiographs of tibial bones from a New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). The analysis was performed on day 3, 14, and 28 of the osseointegration stages with density, trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.), and trabecular number (Tb.N.) as parameters. The implant used is a titanium alloy and coated by SA (sunblasted with alumina acid) of 4 mm in diameter and 7 mm in length. The radiographic assessment of the osseointegration process is obtained with the region of interest (ROI) segmentation results. Additionally, each ROI was analyzed for bone density and morphometry using the open-source ImageJ software with the BoneJ plugin. The significant difference was evaluated by analysis of variance (F-test) with p < 0.05 and nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test with p < 0.05 . Results. Analysis of the osseointegration images of dental implants at day 3, 14, and 28 with the periapical X-ray modality shows significant differences ( p < 0.05 ) in the parameters measuring density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.). In the variables of trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and number (Tb.N.) ( p > 0.05 ), there is no significant difference. Conclusion. Based on the results, density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) showed a significant difference between healing times. However, trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and trabecular number (Tb.N.) showed no difference in healing time.