The paper discusses the al-Iltifât language style in the Arabic tradition of science. Al-Iltifât is the transition of communication patterns in the conversation. Ontologically, al-Iltifât as a style of the language regarded as the crucial part of balaghah study, because there is no unity of definition and scope of study among scholars, even the names are quite varied. In the tradition of classical study, ulama provide various names. The scope of this al-Iltifât is limited to transition on the use of pronouns, the use of verbs, and the transition of themes in the conversation context. In contrast to modern balaghah scholars who are expanding the scope of the al-Iltifât, they are not bound by the definition and scope of the study proposed by classical scholars. They depart from the general terminology that all forms of communication pattern transition are included in the al-Iltifât category. Therefore, they develop various types that have an impressive communication pattern transition.

This article aimed to discuss the theory of mudzakkar and muannats in Arabic. The classification of mudzakkar and muannats is found in most languages, not only in the Smith-Hmit languages family, but also in the Indo-European languages with varying quality and quantity. This linguistic phenomenon is very powerful and is one of the characteristics of the Arabic language. The most popular theory of word grouping into mudzakkar (male) and muannats (females) is a theory seeing a connection and relationship between the word (lafaz) and the meaning (ma’na). In the historical perspective of ancient society, it is also associated with the myths of public belief based on the nature of the world in general consists of mudzakkar and muannats. These theory - in another perspective - especially the ancient society has the power of argument and reason, but in the perspective of modern society has a deadlock of argument and loses its relevance.

This research aimed to describe types of translation and the phenomenon of term unification in the covid-19 dictionary. This was a descriptive qualitative research with a content analysis approach. Data were collected through intensive reading of the covid-19 dictionary to find out translation types in that dictionary. Meanwhile, to gain a description of the term unification, it was done by confirming terms in the covid-19 dictionary to terms that existed in Mu’jam al-Thibbi al-Muwahhad in both printed and digital versions. The research findings indicated that the terms in the Covid-18 dictionary are the translations of English and French terms. In constructing the terms, there are several translation types. Those are direct translation with formal and semantic adjustment, literal translation with matched meaning yet different in its formal form, translation by creating new terms in the target language, descriptive translation, and the combination of translation and Arabization, Arabization and adjustment, and Arabization with no adjustment. In addition, from term unification, some categories were found, namely: standardized terms category, different from standardized terms category, unstandardized terms category, and unavailable terms in Mu’jam al-Thibbi al-Muwahhad category.

The study of teaching Arabic models in Aliy Ma’had was necessary to be conducted. It could make contribution in designing Arabic teaching. The purpose of this research was to analyze the models of Arabic teaching. This research was field research which the researcher obtained and collected data from the research location.  Two types of data were used in this research namely primary data and secondary data. Primary data was obtained from sheikh of Ma'had, 3 chiefs of Ma'had, 10 teachers, and 30 students. Secondary data was obtained from alumni, documents, and online news that was related to the topic. In collecting data, observation, interview, documentation, and FGD were used. Miles and Huberman model was used in this research. The results showed that the teaching Arabic in Aliy Ma’had consisted of four models. First, teaching Arabic with a conventional model: teaching that took place in official classes. Second, teaching Arabic with an extracurricular model: teaching that takes place outside the classroom and is supported by conventional teaching to improve both Arabic language skills. Third, teaching Arabic with the halaqiyah model: students learnt classical Islamic sciences by sitting on the floor in front of the teacher, which took place in the mosque after every evening and dawn prayers. Fourth, teaching Arabic with visiting teacher’s house where students studied further to strengthen scientific and spiritual connections. This research suggested the teacher and the institution in improving this topic to contribute Arabic teaching development in Aliy Ma’had.

Human beings are created by God into two big clustersnamely male and female. Based on striking differences between the two types of creatures has implications for many things, including language..The grouping of nouns by type is a fairly unique phenomenon. The phenomenon is found almost in most languages ​​of the world, not only in the Smith-Hmit family, but in Indo-European languages ​​with varying quality and quantity.In Arabic, the example of this linguistic phenomenon is very powerful and is one of the characteristics of the Arabic language.The most popular theory of word grouping into muzakkar (male) and muannats (females) is a theory that sees a connection and relationship between the word(lafaz) and the meaning (Makna). In the historical perspective of ancient society, it is also associated with the myths of public belief based on the nature of the world in general consists of muzakkar and muannats.These theory - in another perspective - especially the ancient society has the power of argument and reason, but in the perspective of modern society has a deadlock of argument and loses its relevance. The issue not only ends in the classification aspect, but it is more difficult to make perfect rules that can be followed to identify the types of muzakkar and muannats. The rules of muzakkar and muannats in the reference books of nahwu are not separated from a large number of exceptions. Therefore, the conclusion of the muzakkar and muannats theories in Arabic refers to the tradition of Arabic usage of a particular word, and empowering a complete encyclopedia of muzakkar and muannats rather than creating many rules that are unable to accommodate a general distinction between the two type of the word.