Taxol is an antitumor agent in clinical trial that has been shown to have activity against advanced ovarian carcinoma and melanoma. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) have been one of the toxicities observed with administration of this drug. Of 301 patients treated, 32 patients have had definite (27 patients) or possible (five patients) hypersensitivity reactions to taxol. All but one patient had the reaction from the first or second exposure to this agent. Reactions occurred at a variety of doses and were characterized most frequently by dyspnea, hypotension, bronchospasm, urticaria, and erythematous rashes. Thirteen (41%) patients had received premedication designed to prevent such toxicity; nevertheless, they sustained HSRs. Prolonging the drug infusion appears to have somewhat reduced, but not obviated, the risk of HSRs. The cause (taxol itself or its excipient Cremophor EL; Badische Anilin und Soda-Fabrik AG [BASF], Ludwigshafen, Federal Republic of Germany) and the mechanism of these reactions to taxol are unknown. We provide guidelines to prevent or minimize such toxicity and treat reactions if they still occur.
Within the conventional dose range for this chemotherapy regimen, a higher dose is associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival.
BACKGROUND The long‐term impact of breast carcinoma and its treatment was assessed in 153 breast carcinoma survivors previously treated on a Phase III randomized trial (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB 7581]) a median of 20 years after entry to CALGB 7581. METHODS Survivors were interviewed by telephone using the following standardized measures: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), PostTraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist with the trauma defined as survivors' response to having had cancer (PCL‐C), Conditioned Nausea, Vomiting and Distress, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ‐C30 (quality of life), Life Experience Survey (stressful events), MOS Social Support Survey, comorbid conditions (Older Americans Resources and Services Questionnaire), and items developed to assess long‐term breast carcinoma treatment side effects and their interference with functioning. RESULTS Only 5% of survivors had scores that were suggestive of clinical levels of distress (BSI), 15% reported 2 or more posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PCL‐C) that were moderately to extremely bothersome, 1–6% reported conditioned nausea, emesis, and distress as a consequence of sights, smells, and tastes triggered by reminders of their treatment, 29% reported sexual problems attributed to having had cancer, 39% reported lymphedema, and 33%, reported numbness. Survivors who reported greater lymphedema and numbness that interfered with functioning had significantly worse PTSD (PCL‐C; P = 0.008) com‐ pared with survivors who reported less lymphedema and numbness. Survivors with a lower level of education (P = 0.026), less adequate social support (P = 0.0033), more severe negative life events (P = 0.0098), and greater dissatisfaction with their medical care (P = 0.037) had worse PTSD compared with other survivors. CONCLUSIONS Twenty years after the initial treatment, the impact of breast carcinoma on survivors' adjustment was minimal. However, the higher prevalence of PTSD symptoms in response to having had cancer is indicative of continuing psychologic sequelae long after treatment completion. Findings related to lymphedema and numbness and continued symptoms of PTSD suggest that the long‐term psychologic and medical sequelae on adjustment may be underrecognized. To establish in more detail whether survivors' overall psychologic state is any different from that of individuals without cancer, a population of community residents without cancer would need to be studied. Cancer 2003;98:679–89. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11531
Cisplatin was discovered to have cytotoxic properties in the 1960s, and by the end of the 1970s it had earned a place as the key ingredient in the systemic treatment of germ cell cancers. Since the early seminal work in the preclinical and clinical development of this drug, several thousand analogues have been synthesised and tested for properties that would enhance the therapeutic index of cisplatin. About 13 of these analogues have been evaluated in clinical trials, but only one (carboplatin) has provided definite advantage over cisplatin and achieved worldwide approval. However, carboplatin has afforded benefit only in reducing some cisplatin toxicities; it has not enlarged the spectrum of platinum-sensitive cancers, nor has it proved active in cisplatin-resistant cancers. The major obstacle to the efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin is platinum resistance, either innate or acquired. The mechanisms of this resistance have been under intense study, and many of the cisplatin analogues synthesised in the past decade have been designed specifically with the hope of overcoming platinum resistance. The mechanism of the cytotoxic activity of platinum complexes has also been studied intensely. Recently synthesised analogues have been designed to interact with DNA in a manner different from cisplatin and carboplatin, with the desire of finding new structures with a superior or wider spectrum of antitumor efficacy. Most recently, water soluble platinum complexes that retain antitumour activity, but that can be effectively absorbed after oral administration, have been synthesised with the goal of improving patient quality of life. Nine platinum analogues are currently in clinical trials around the world (ormaplatin [tetraplatin], oxaliplatin, DWA2114R, enloplatin, lobaplatin, CI-973 [NK-121], 254-S, JM-216 and liposome-entrapped cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II) [LNDDP]). Some of these analogues only represent attempts to reduce cisplatin toxicity and/or allow administration without forced hydration and diuresis, which carboplatin already does. Others are 'third generation' complexes shown to have limited or no cross-resistance with cisplatin in preclinical studies. They are being tested clinically with particular attention to this highly desirable property.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.