Two hundred twenty-six patients with bacteremia were prospectively enrolled in a randomized trial that was performed to determine the clinical impact of the receipt of in vitro microbiological data by the physician soon after organism detection as opposed to having the physicians wait until similar data were available by routine methods. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of 110 isolates were determined by direct inoculation of the Vitek AutoMicrobic system (Vitek Systems, Inç., Hazelwood, Mo.) with a sample from a positive blood culture vial. One hundred sixteen isolates were processed by routine methods. Microbiological results were available within an average of 8.8 h by the direct method yersus an average of 48 h by the routine method. In both groups an infectious disease fellow used the information to make therapeutic recommendations to the responsible physician. When compared with that provided by the routine method, the information provided by the direct method was significantly more likely to result in an initiation of antibiotic therapy, a change to more effective therapy, or a change to less expensive therapy. Recommendations were significantly more likely to be followed in patients whose isolates were processed by the direct method versus the routine method. A projected savings of $158 per patient was estimated for the patients who were changed to less expensive therapy or in whom antibiotics were discontinued because results were available sooner. These cost savings, coupled with changes in therapy made for reasons of efficacy, support the usefulness of the earlier reporting of the identity and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial blood culture isolates.

The in vitro susceptibility of 27 Campylobacter jejuni, 31 Campylobacter coli, and 30 Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus strains to 12 antimicrobial agents was determined. Ciprofloxacin, a new quinoline derivative, was the most active agent tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility differed among the three species tested.

A new enzyme immunoassay (EIA), PREMIER Cryptococcal Antigen, was compared with latex agglutination (LA) for the detection and quantitation of circulating capsular polysaccharide antigen from Cryptococcus neoformans. The clinical evaluation of PREMIER EIA as a screening assay, including 475 specimens with 120 LA and EIA positives, resulted in 99% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The clinical specimens included sera and cerebrospinal fluids as well as 10 rheumatoid factor-positive and 20 anti-nuclear antibody-positive serum samples. This monoclonal antibody-based assay detects serotypes A to D at 0.63, 0.63, 7.8, and 62 ng/ml, respectively. With three different known positive specimens, the assay was found to yield coefficients of variation of 2 to 12% for intra-and interassay comparisons of precision and reproducibility. The primary use for semiquantitative values derived with the LA or EIA is to follow the course of disease and monitor drug therapies. The present data suggest that the PREMIER EIA will be a valuable method for this purpose. We conclude that the PREMIER Cryptococcal Antigen EIA provides a rapid, convenient, and reliable antigen detection method for screening and semiquantitative determination of antigen levels.

Fusarium is a ubiquitous fungus that commonly colonizes ulcerated, burned, or traumatized skin and may cause keratitis and onychomycosis in healthy hosts. Serious disseminated infection due to Fusarium has been reported with increasing frequency in immunocompromised patients. We describe a bone marrow transplant patient who developed fungal septicemia and disseminated skin nodules due to Fusarium solani. Fusarium should be recognized as a potential cause of deep fungal infection in immunocompromised patients.