Differentiating melanocytic hyperplasia (MH) on photodamaged skin from junctional lentiginous melanocytic proliferations (JLMP), early evolving melanoma in situ (MIS), or the periphery of a lesion of MIS on staged excision can be challenging. Although previous cross-sectional studies have elucidated important criteria for distinguishing MH on photodamaged skin from more concerning lesions, this study highlights a technique to treat JLMP and MIS with staged mapped excision and baseline scouting biopsies of adjacent nonlesional photodamaged skin to assist in determination of surgical margin clearance. Additionally, we compare the lesional and photodamaged control biopsies from the same patient to evaluate relevant histologic criteria that may be used to distinguish MH in photodamaged skin from JLMP/MIS, while minimizing confounding factors. There was a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) found for melanocyte density, irregular melanocyte distribution, melanocyte clustering, follicular infundibulum involvement, and nesting. However, criteria such as nesting, epithelioid cells and melanocyte clustering were seen in both photodamaged skin and MIS. These findings underscore the fact that histologic features of photodamaged skin can overlap with the histopathological features of MIS. Of all of the criteria evaluated, melanocytic density was the most objective histologic criterion and did not show overlap between the sun-damaged and JLMP/MIS groups. K E Y W O R D S atypical junctional melanocytic hyperplasia, lentigo maligna, melanoma in situ, scouting biopsy, slow Mohs, staged excision How to cite this article: Speiser J, Tao J, Champlain A, et al. Is melanocyte density our last hope? Comparison of histologic features of photodamaged skin and melanoma in situ after staged surgical excision with concurrent scouting biopsies.

Imperfect or unusual presentation, morphology, or immunophenotype can make the diagnosis of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) very challenging. To illustrate this, we present 5 unique cases from the archives of our tertiary care academic medical center that presented a diagnostic challenge wherein FDCS was the top differential diagnostic possibility. The workup of these cases, including multiple expert consultations, highlights the importance of avoiding specific pitfalls in the diagnosis of FDCS.

No abstract

Background: At times, distinguishing Bowen disease (BD) and benign seborrheic keratosis (SK) is histologically challenging, especially when SK shows clonal features (clonal seborrheic keratosis [CSK]). While p16 is often reported as positive in BD and negative in SK, p16 expression in CSK is rarely studied. Here we investigate p16 immunohistochemistry in CSK, SK, and BD.Methods: p16 immunohistochemistry with pattern of expression was noted for 14 CSK, 12 SK, and 18 BD. The degree of inflammation among lesions with respect to p16 expression was also noted.Results: When examining p16 staining in clonal nests of CSK, 57% showed diffuse or patchy/ diffuse positivity, 21% showed patchy positivity, and 21% showed clusters of single positive cells. 67% of BD showed diffuse positivity, 11% showed patchy/diffuse positivity, 17% showed patchy positivity, and 6% were negative. 25% of SK showed focal areas of patchy to full thickness positivity, 25% showed moderate number of positive single cells with or without patchy staining, and 50% showed negative/scattered single cell positivity.Conclusion: Our findings support that p16 positivity limited to clonal nests in CSK is normal. p16 positivity in clonal nests of CSK in isolation without concurrent atypical histologic features should not be used to support a diagnosis of BD. K E Y W O R D Sclonal, seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, immunohistochemistry, p16

No abstract