An evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) was performed in seven laboratories using 625 Brucella strains from different animal and geographical origins. This robust test can differentiate in a single step all of the classical Brucella species, including those found in marine mammals and the S19, RB51, and Rev.1 vaccine strains.Brucellosis is caused by a facultative intracellular bacterium of the genus Brucella, and it is one of the most frequent bacterial zoonoses in low-income countries, where the control programs have not succeeded in eradicating this neglected zoonosis. The disease is a major cause of direct economic losses and an impediment to trade and exportation. The genus Brucella consists of six recognized species, designated on the basis of differences in pathogenicity and host preference: B. melitensis (goats and sheep), B. abortus (cattle and bison), B. suis (infecting primarily swine but also hares, rodents, and reindeer), B. ovis (sheep), B. canis (dogs), and B. neotomae (wood rats) (7). The discovery of Brucella in a wide variety of marine mammals has led to the proposal of two new species: B. ceti (cetaceans) and B. pinnipedialis (pinnipeds) (8). Some of these species include several biovars, which are currently distinguished from each other by an analysis of approximately 25 phenotypic characteristics, including requirement for CO 2 , H 2 S production, sensitivity to dyes and phages, and other metabolic properties (1). However, all these tests are time-consuming, require skilled technicians, and are not straightforward, and some reagents are not commercially available. In addition, handling of this microorganism represents a high risk for laboratory personnel, since most Brucella strains are highly pathogenic for humans. Accurate diagnostic and typing procedures are critical for the success of the eradication and control of the disease, and therefore the identification of the different species is of great epidemiological importance. In order to overcome most of these difficulties, PCR-based assays have been employed for molecular typing of Brucella species. However, one of the challenges of using DNA-based techniques for differentiating the various Brucella species and strains is their high degree of genetic homology (16). This article describes the evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay (10), named Bruce-ladder, in seven different European laboratories. The PCR protocol was standardized previously (10), and the same protocol was used in all laboratories (see the supplemental material). The selection of the DNA sequences to design the PCR primers was based on species-specific or strain-specific genetic differences (Table 1). Each laboratory used its own Brucella strain collection, typed by standard bacteriological procedures (1). A total of 625 Brucella strains were used (see the complete list in the supplemental material). The collection included the reference strains of all biovars of B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis, and B. ovis, B. canis, B. neotomae, the B. abortus S19, B. ...

13 14Four simple and rapid field tests for the serodiagnosis of brucellosis in cattle, goat, 15 sheep and swine were developed. The performance of the assays was investigated using 16 serum samples collected in Portugal from animals originating from herds with a defined 17 sanitary status with respect to the presence of brucellosis. The sensitivity calculated for the 18 bovine, caprine, ovine and swine Brucella lateral flow assays based on results obtained for 19 samples collected from animals with culture confirmed brucellosis was 90%, 100%, 90% and 20 73%, respectively. None of the samples from animals from herds free of brucellosis reacted in 21 the flow assays indicating a high specificity. However, as expected, some degree of reactivity 22 was observed when testing selected serum samples that reacted non-specific in reference 23 tests for brucellosis. 24 25

-A modified Rose Bengal test (mRB) and an indirect ELISA (iELISA) with Protein G as the conjugate, were evaluated for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in unvaccinated sheep with a known bacteriological status, and their diagnostic efficacy was compared with that of the standard Rose Bengal (RB) and Complement Fixation (CF) tests used in the current eradication campaign in EU countries. All tests showed 100% specificity when testing the sera from 212 Brucella-free sheep. When testing the sera from 219 Brucella melitensis culture-positive sheep, both the mRB and iELISA tests were more sensitive (98.6% and 96.8%, respectively) than the RB and CF tests (95.0% and 92.7%, respectively). These results were similar when testing the sera from 181 animals belonging to infected flocks but found bacteriologically negative, suggesting that the mRB or iELISA tests could advantageously replace the current RB procedure used as the screening test.sheep / Brucella melitensis / serological diagnosis / modified rose bengal test / indirect ELISA