This study aims: 1. To determine and analyze law enforcement against violations of health protocols during the Covid-19 pandemic in Ambon City. 2. To find out and analyze the application of sanctions for violations of health protocols committed by the community during the Covid-19 pandemic in Ambon City. This research was conducted using a normative juridical research using a statutory approach, a conceptual analysis approach which is a descriptive study of qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that Law Enforcement against violations of health protocols during the Covid 19 pandemic in Ambon City is carried out based on statutory regulations, by limiting Community Activities (PKM), Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) as a form of law enforcement against health protocol violations. during the Covid 19 pandemic in Ambon City through socialization in preventing the spread of the Covid 19 virus and Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) by applying sanctions against offenders. However, law enforcement against violations of health protocols has not been carried out properly. This is due to the fact that health protocol violations are still occurring in Ambon city. 2. Imposing sanctions for violations of health protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ambon city which is regulated in the Ambon City Mayor's Regulation on PSBB by applying written warning sanctions, administrative sanctions, social sanctions and criminal sanctions to violators. However, the application of sanctions against violators has not provided a deterrent effect on health protocol violators.

Probe principle flips over at ruled Indonesia bases Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Remove criminal act of Corruptions. That law applies two probe principles, which is circumscribed upending probe (section 37 and 37A) and pure upending probe (section 12B sentences 1a). But Indonesia until now haven't applied evidence upending as one is managed in that law. Probe that is applied at Indonesia to corruption case is get negative character or up on ground beyond   reasonable doubt one that gets orientation on Section rule 183 KUHAP.

Introduction: The SPPA Law is a regulation that applies restorative justice and diversion as an effort to divert cases from litigation to non-litigation. Children as perpetrators of criminal acts in the process of resolving criminal cases must be diversified at the police (investigation), prosecutor's office, and court levels.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to find new ideas and discuss the success of diversion at the investigation stage for juvenile offenders.Methods of the Research: This research is normative research, the type of research is descriptive analytical. The sources of legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this writing was carried out by means of library research on legal materials, both primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and analysis of legal materials used by the author is descriptive qualitative which identifies the primary and secondary legal materials used. will be carried out in analyzing problems in a series of processing stages by carrying out an inventory, systematization, to make it easier to analyze these problems.Results of the Research: Based on the problems studied, the authors found several new ideas about the success of diversion at the level of investigation which were influenced by several factors including 1) the victim factor where the victim was willing to forgive the perpetrator's actions; 2) the actor's factor where the perpetrator is willing to agree to compensation that has been agreed upon with the victim; 3) the Investigative factor, namely the role of the pro-active investigator as a facilitator in seeking maximum diversion and opening a space for peace between the perpetrator and the victim; 4) the factor of freedom in which the Children's Community Guidance Resources who understand their role as diversion facilitators maximally want to provide assistance to children in an effort to make peace between perpetrators and victims; 5) the family factor, namely the victim's family who wants peace and influences the victim to make peace with the perpetrator and 6) the community factor where the role of the community in this case is represented by community leaders, traditional leaders, or religious leaders as facilitators in efforts to settle peace between the perpetrators and victims of crime

Introduction: This study discusses the legal protection of child victims of online prostitution through the MiChat application Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and discussing forms of legal protection for children who are victims of online prostitution through the MICHAT application and efforts to overcome online prostitution against children. Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Results of the Research: The results of the study show that online prostitution of children through the Michat application is on the rise, the lack of coordination between agencies, and the lack of legal awareness in this case law enforcement officers, KPAI, NGOs, parents, and other community institutions, causing the handling of cases of online prostitution crimes. not maximal. Preventive efforts and repressive efforts carried out by law enforcement officers have not been able to provide maximum legal protection to children who are victims of online prostitution. Thus, mitigation efforts must be carried out optimally, in order to provide legal protection to children who are victims of online prostitution through the MiChat application

People with pedophilia or pedofilis, making the children as the target. A pedofilis, generally perform actions, just because her desire motivation by satisfy his sexual fantasies that the crime of pedophilia is an ongoing threat to social order in society.