Histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer, is characterized by considerable inter-observer variability. Previously, post hoc dichotomization of multi-categorical variables was used to determine the 'ideal' cut-offs for dichotomous assessment. The present international multi-center study evaluated inter-observer variability among 39 pathologists who performed upfront dichotomous evaluation of 149 consecutive DCIS.All pathologists independently assessed nuclear atypia, necrosis, solid DCIS architecture, calcifications, stromal architecture and lobular cancerization in one digital slide per lesion. Stromal inflammation was assessed semi-quantitatively. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were quantified as percentages and dichotomously assessed with a cut-off at 50%. Krippendorff's alpha (KA), Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for the appropriate variables.Lobular cancerization (KA = 0,396), nuclear atypia (KA = 0,422) and stromal architecture (KA = 0,450) showed the highest inter-observer variability. Stromal inflammation (KA = 0,564), dichotomously assessed TILs (KA = 0,520) and comedonecrosis (KA = 0,539) showed slightly lower inter-observer disagreement. Solid DCIS architecture (KA = 0,602) and calcifications (KA = 0,676) presented with the lowest inter-observer variability. Semi-quantitative assessment of stromal inflammation resulted in a slightly higher inter-observer concordance than upfront dichotomous TILs assessment (KA = 0,564 versus KA = 0,520). High stromal inflammation corresponded best with dichotomously assessed TILs when the cut-off was set at 10% (kappa = 0,881). Nevertheless, a post hoc TILs cut-off set at 20% resulted in the highest inter-observer agreement (KA = 0,669).Despite upfront dichotomous evaluation, the inter-observer variability remains considerable and is at most acceptable, although it varies among the different histopathological features. Future studies should investigate its impact on DCIS prognostication. Forthcoming machine learning algorithms may be useful to tackle this substantial diagnostic challenge.

High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathological assessment of sTILs in TNBC biopsies is characterized by substantial interobserver variability, but it is unknown whether this affects its association with pCR. Here, we aimed to investigate the degree of interobserver variability in an international study, and its impact on the relationship between sTILs and pCR. Forty pathologists assessed sTILs as a percentage in digitalized biopsy slides, originating from 41 TNBC patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Pathological response was quantified by the MD Anderson Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated per pathologist duo and Bland-Altman plots were constructed. The relation between sTILs and pCR or RCB class was investigated. The ICCs ranged from −0.376 to 0.947 (mean: 0.659), indicating substantial interobserver variability. Nevertheless, high sTILs scores were significantly associated with pCR for 36 participants (90%), and with RCB class for 8 participants (20%). Post hoc sTILs cut-offs at 20% and 40% resulted in variable associations with pCR. The sTILs in TNBC with RCB-II and RCB-III were intermediate to those of RCB-0 and RCB-I, with lowest sTILs observed in RCB-I. However, the limited number of RCB-I cases precludes any definite conclusions due to lack of power, and this observation therefore requires further investigation. In conclusion, sTILs are a robust marker for pCR at the group level. However, if sTILs are to be used to guide the NAC scheme for individual patients, the observed interobserver variability might substantially affect the chance of obtaining a pCR. Future studies should determine the ‘ideal’ sTILs threshold, and attempt to fine-tune the patient selection for sTILs-based de-escalation of NAC regimens. At present, there is insufficient evidence for robust and reproducible sTILs-guided therapeutic decisions.

Objective: Better cosmetic outcome after vacuum assisted excision (VAE) compared to surgical excision of benign breast lesions is suggested in previous studies but has never been evaluated with validated outcome measures. In this study patient reported cosmetic outcome after VAEwas evaluated. Methods: Patients who underwent VAE between July 2017 and December 2018 were invited to complete the cosmetic subscale of the Dutch Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale, comparing the treated with the untreated breast. Response mode ranged from 1 (no difference) to 4 (large difference) and cosmetic outcome was calculated as the unweighted mean. Clinical outcomes included: tumor size, number of cores, complications, residual lesions and recurrences. Results: Response rate was 73.4% (47 of 64 patients). Mediantumor size was 15 mm (range 5–51 mm) and median number of cores 6.5 (range 1–85), complete excision was confirmed in all but two patients. Mean cosmetic outcome was good (mean score ≤1.75) in 74% of patients and no patients reported a poor cosmetic outcome (mean score >3.25). A hematoma occurred in five patients (one needed aspiration) and a skin rash in one patient, no patients developed an infection or seroma. Conclusion: In this study VAE is safe and effective for tumors up to 5 cm and patient reported cosmetic outcome was good. Patients with benign lesions could benefit from VAE as an alternative for surgical excision. Advances in knowledge: A formal quantitative measurement of cosmetic outcome after vacuum assisted excision for benign breast lesions was still lacking. This study shows that this cosmetic outcome is overall good in benign lesions up to 5 cm.

No abstract

IntroductionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide but almost half of the patients have an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 98%–99%. These patients could potentially be treated with thermal ablation to avoid surgical excision, reduce treatment-related morbidity and increase patients’ quality of life without jeopardising treatment effectiveness. Previous studies showed highest complete ablation rates for radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation. However, due to heterogeneity among studies, it is unknown which of these three techniques should be selected for a phase 3 comparative study.Methods and analysisThe aim of this phase 2 screening trial is to determine the efficacy rate of radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation with the intention to select one treatment for further testing in a phase 3 trial. Additionally, exploratory data are obtained for the phase 3 trial. The design is a multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial. Patients with unifocal, invasive breast cancer with a maximum diameter of 2 cm without lymph node or distant metastases are included. Triple negative, Bloom-Richardson grade 3 tumours and patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be excluded. Included patients will be allocated to receive one of the three thermal ablation techniques. Three months later surgical excision will be performed to determine the efficacy of thermal ablation. Treatment efficacy in terms of complete ablation rate will be assessed with CK 8/18 and H&E staining. Secondary outcomes include feasibility of the techniques in an outpatient setting, accuracy of MRI for complete ablation, patient satisfaction, adverse events, side effects, cosmetic outcome, system usability and immune response.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol was approved by Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNL9205 (www.trialregister.nl); Pre-results.