Purpose Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of lidocaine sprayed onto the larynx and/or injected into the tracheal tube cuff to decrease the incidence of cough at extubation and postoperative sore throat. Methods One hundred twenty women scheduled for gynecological surgery \ 120 min in duration were enrolled in this randomized double-blind prospective study. Prior to tracheal intubation, 4% lidocaine or 0.9% saline was sprayed onto the patients' supra-and subglottic areas.After tracheal intubation, the tracheal tube cuff was filled with either an alkalinized 2% lidocaine solution or 0.9% saline. This resulted in four groups: spray-cuff, spray-saline, saline-cuff, and saline-saline. A logistic regression comprising the two factors was used for analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of cough at extubation. The secondary outcome was the incidence and severity of sore throat reported by patients at 15 min, 60 min, and 24 hr after tracheal extubation. Results Cough occurred in 42%, 24%, 63%, and 69% of patients in the spray-cuff, spray-saline, saline-cuff, and saline-saline groups, respectively. The use of lidocaine spray decreased the incidence of cough at extubation (odds ratio = 0.256; 95% confidence interval 0.118 to 0.554; P \ 0.001); however, the use of intracuff alkalinized lidocaine had no impact on the occurrence of cough (P = 0.471). Severity of sore throat was clinically low (visual analog scale [VAS] B 3) in all groups. No significant difference was observed in hoarseness, dysphagia, nausea, or vomiting. Conclusion Sprayed lidocaine decreases the incidence of cough at tracheal extubation in surgeries of less than two hours. The use of alkalinized lidocaine into high-volume/ low-pressure endotracheal cuffs had no impact on decreasing the incidence of cough or pain.
We prospectively evaluated, in randomized order, 2 indirect methods of confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia in 218 surgical patients: epidural stimulation test (EST) and epidural pressure waveform analysis (EPWA). The epidural space was localized by using a loss of resistance technique. All catheters were inserted 5 cm into the epidural space and primed with 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline. There were no differences between the methods: the positive predictive value and specificity were high (100% in both groups), but the sensitivity was moderate (80% for EST and 81% for EPWA) and the negative predictive value was low (16% for EST and 17% for EPWA). Combining both methods yielded better sensitivity (97%) and negative predictive value (57%) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of EST was increased to 87% (P < 0.05) if sensory response was included as well as motor response for stimulation less than 10 mA. We suggest the inclusion of sensory response in the appropriate dermatome at a current <10 mA as a criterion for adequate epidural catheter localization for EST testing. EPWA sensitivity was significantly better with older patients: 94% for patients older than 80 yr compared with 63% for patients younger than 40, 73% for patients 40 to 60, and 85% for patients aged 60 to 80 yr (P = 0.03). We conclude that the two tests are comparable for confirming catheter placement.
Perceived social support was assessed among 53 patients suffering from non-life-threatening chronic illnesses (i.e., irritable bowel syndrome or recurrent headache). Subjects recalled predominantly helpful support interactions and reported the three major types of social support as equally helpful. In addition, irritable bowel syndrome patients, who experience embarrassing physical symptoms, reported fewer instances of tangible assistance than chronic headache patients. Comparisons to cancer patients studied by Dakof and Taylor (1990) revealed differences in perceived social support as a function of diagnosis. These results offer insight into the needs of patients with noncatastrophic illnesses and suggest that the challenges and tasks confronting these individuals are unique from those encountered by patients with catastrophic diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.