This is a peer-reviewed, post-print (final draft post-refereeing) version of the following published document, Conditions of use Articles published within the Springer Nature group of companies which are made available through academic repositories remain subject to copyright. The following restrictions on use of such articles apply: Academic research only 1. Archived content may only be used for academic research. Any content downloaded for text based experiments should be destroyed when the experiment is complete. Use must not be for Commercial Purposes 2. Archived content may not be used for purposes that are intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, licence, loan, transfer or any other form of commercial exploitation ("Commercial Purposes"). Wholesale re-publishing is prohibited 3. Archived content may not be published verbatim in whole or in part, whether or not this is done for Commercial Purposes, either in print or online. 4. This restriction does not apply to reproducing normal quotations with an appropriate citation. In the case of text-mining, individual words, concepts and quotes up to 100 words per matching sentence may be used, whereas longer paragraphs of text and images cannot (without specific permission from Springer Nature). Moral rights 5. All use must be fully attributed. Attribution must take the form of a link-using the article DOI-to the published article on the journal's website. 6. All use must ensure that the authors' moral right to the integrity of their work is not compromised. Third party content 7. Where content in the document is identified as belonging to a third party, it is the obligation of the user to ensure that any use complies with copyright policies of the owner. Use at own risk 8. Any use of Springer Nature content is at your own risk and Springer Nature accepts no liability arising from such use. and is licensed under Publisher's Licence license:

Animals are surveyed many different ways and have been for many years. Nocturnal animals in South Africa, such as aardvark (Orycteropus afer), porcupine (Hystrix africaeaustralis) and serval (Leptailurus serval) are notoriously elusive and difficult to detect. Many different methods have previously been used to study them, but direct empirical comparisons between methods are rare. Discovering if there is one overall technique that is better than any other or if there is an ideal combination of methods will assist future researchers in their studies, making it easier for them to discover particular species as well as finding them more often. In this study, it is aimed to find whether or not there is a single method that is better at detecting nocturnal species than any other method, or whether or not it is a combination of multiple methods used in tandem, as previously thought. Two different types of camera trapping and driven nocturnal transects using spotlights are compared with one another over an 18 month period to discover which is best for detecting a range of nocturnal species found at a site in South Africa. It was found that more common species, such as jackal were found often on driven nocturnal transects, with the rarer species found more often on camera traps, however not all species that are present on the site were found using either method, indicating a high degree of chance in discovering rarer species. These results suggest that while there may not be any one method that gives the best chance to discover all nocturnal species, researchers can pick certain methods for certain species in order to give the best chance of discovery.