Semi-automated reflectance readings of urinalysis dipsticks showed better precision than visual readings in the case of artificially prepared urine samples containing glucose, ketone, and protein. Actual pathological specimens containing glucose, protein, and nitrite also showed that instrumental readings were better than visual. Results of repeated visual readings spread over three different color blocks for certain concentrations of glucose, ketone, and protein, whereas repeated instrumental readings were never spread greater than two color blocks. Subjectivity can be reduced by semi-automated dipstick urinalysis.
Sterile whole human blood control materials were commercially prepared in batches containing anticoagulants and preservatives and approximately 90, 150, and 230 mg/dL ethanol with and without 0.3% (w/v) sodium azide. Aliquots in sealed vials were stored by the manufacturer at 2-8 degrees C until shipped monthly to three academic toxicology laboratories that analyzed them in duplicate by gas chromatographic headspace methods at monthly intervals for one year. The resulting data were pooled, and grand mean values were statistically analyzed to determine the respective alcohol stability in these azide-free and azide-containing blood samples. Azide-containing blood samples showed no alcohol losses during the 1-year period. Azide-free blood containing 1.0% (w/v) sodium fluoride and anticoagulants had small alcohol decreases over time, the total losses after one year being less than 5% of the original alcohol concentrations. The initial alcohol concentration of approximately 40 mg/dL also did not change during storage of additional samples of azide-free blood for one month at 4 degrees C. We concluded that addition of sodium azide to performance-test and control blood specimens for alcohol analysis is unnecessary and unwarranted and that alcohol losses in such blood samples can be minimized by simple appropriate treatments and conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.