The Re–Os (rhenium–osmium) chronometer applied to molybdenite (MoS2) is now demonstrated to be remarkably robust, surviving intense deformation and high‐grade thermal metamorphism. Successful dating of molybdenite is dependent on proper preparation of the mineral separate and analysis of a critical quantity of molybdenite, unique to each sample, such that recognized spatial decoupling of 187Re parent and 187Os daughter within individual molybdenite crystals is overcome. Highly precise, accurate and reproducible age results are derived through isotope dilution and negative thermal ion mass spectrometry (ID‐NTIMS). Spatial decoupling of parent–daughter precludes use of the laser ablation ICP‐MS microanalytical technique for Re–Os dating of molybdenite. The use of a reference or control sample is necessary to establish laboratory credibility and for interlaboratory comparisons. The Rb–Sr, K–Ar and 40Ar/39Ar chronometers are susceptible to chemical and thermal disturbance, particularly in terranes that have experienced subsequent episodes of hydrothermal/magmatic activity, and therefore should not be used as a basis for establishing accuracy in Re–Os dating of molybdenite, as has been done in the past. Re–Os ages for molybdenite are almost always in agreement with observed geological relationships and, when available, with zircon and titanite U–Pb ages. For terranes experiencing multiple episodes of metamorphism and deformation, molybdenite is not complicated by overgrowths as is common for some minerals used in U–Pb dating (e.g. zircon, monazite, xenotime), nor are Re and Os mobilized beyond the margins of individual crystals during solid‐state recrystallization. Moreover, inheritance of older molybdenite cores, incorporation of common Os, and radiogenic Os loss are exceedingly rare, whereas inheritance, common Pb and Pb loss are common complications in U–Pb dating techniques. Therefore, molybdenite ages may serve as point‐in‐time markers for age comparisons.

Isotope dilution with a modified alkali fusion procedure and negative thermal ion mass spectrometry yields highly precise and accurate Re-Os ages for molybdenite from two well-studied molybdenite deposits in the East Qinling molybdenum belt, China. Individual Re-Os ages carry a 2or precision of _+0.40 to 0.57 percent which includes a 0.31 percent uncertainty in the lS7Re decay constant. For the unusual carbonatite-hosted Mo-Pb deposit at Huanglongpu, the weighted average of seven analyses yields an age of 221.5 _+ 0.3 (0.15%) Ma. The weighted average of two analyses of molybdenite from a porphyry Mo deposit at Jinduicheng, about 10 km to the southwest, yields an age of 138.4 _+ 0.5 (0.39%) Ma. These data provide uncertainties an order of magnitude less than previous Re-Os ages. Molybdenite Re-Os ages are slightly older than ages obtained by other isotopic methods for genetically related host-rock and vein material. It appears that the direct dating of sulfide, rather than altered host and vein material, may be critical to acquiring the correct age for mineralization. The East Qinling molybdenum belt is part of a larger east-west-trending zone that marks the suture between two major cratonic blocks. Consequently, the belt was a site for Early-Middle Triassic compression (Indosinian orogeny) followed by Jurassic-Cretaceous extension (Yenshanian orogeny). We suggest that the Huanglongpu and Jinduicheng deposits provide an analogue for processes that may have been important ingenerating major molybdenum deposits in the Colorado mineral belt. In Colorado, Late Cretaceous (Laramide) compression-related, alkalic magmatism was followed by Tertiary (Rio Grande) extension-related, granitic magmatism and the development of major Climax-type porphyry Mo deposits. In particular, the Jinduicheng deposit appears to be a nearly perfect match for Climax-type mineralization in Colorado. In contrast, the older Huanglongpu deposit may record a mechanism whereby molybdenum is concentrated in the lower crust. In both the Qinling molybdenum belt and the Colorado mineral belt, a time gap of about 50 to 80 m.y. separates alkalic magmatism and exceptionally evolved granitic magmatism.

Two Re‐Os dating reference material molybdenites were prepared. Molybdenite JDC and molybdenite HLP are from a carbonate vein‐type molybdenum‐(lead)‐uranium deposit in the Jinduicheng‐Huanglongpu area of Shaanxi province, China. The samples proved to be homogeneous, based on the coefficient of variation of analytical results and an analysis of variance test. The sampling weight was 0.1 g for JDC and 0.025 g for HLP. An isotope dilution method was used for the determination of Re and Os. Sample decomposition and pre‐concentration of Re and Os prior to measurement were accomplished using a variety of methods: acid digestion, alkali fusion, ion exchange and solvent extraction. Negative thermal ionisation mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry were used for the determination of Re and 187Os concentration and isotope ratios. The certified values include the contents of Re and Os and the model ages. For HLP, the Re content was 283.8 ± 6.2 μg g−1, 187Os was 659 ± 14 ng g−1 and the Re‐Os model age was 221.4 ± 5.6 Ma. For JDC, the Re content was 17.39 ± 0.32 μg g−1, 187Os was 25.46 ± 0.60 ng g−1 and the Re‐Os model age was 139.6 ± 3.8 Ma. Uncertainties for both certified reference materials are stated at the 95% level of confidence. Three laboratories (from three countries: PR. China, USA, Sweden) joined in the certification programme. These certified reference materials are primarily useful for Re‐Os dating of molybdenite, sulfides, black shale, etc.

No abstract

No abstract