No abstract

A comprehensive radiative transfer model is used to calculate surface spectral ultraviolet irradiance under cloud‐free conditions. The results are compared with measurements made at Lauder, New Zealand (45°S, 170°E) before and after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo and including a snow‐covered surface. There is reasonable agreement between measured and calculated diffuse, direct, and global irradiances over the range 300 to 450 nm. Discrepancies may be due to calibration errors in the UV measurements, or in the extra terrestrial irradiances input to the model. Ratios of diffuse/direct irradiances are independent of such calibration uncertainties and therefore provide a sensitive test of the model. If appropriate ozonesonde data, surface albedo, and aerosol optical properties are used, the model ratios are in satisfactory agreement with measurements over a wide range of observing conditions. For cases in which the atmospheric optical properties are best known the agreement is better than 8% in the UV‐B range, and for wavelengths 320 to 450 nm the deviation is smaller. The comparison suggests that the ultraviolet radiation exposure can be computed with confidence for clear sky conditions if the appropriate atmospheric molecular density profiles, ozonesonde data, surface albedo, and aerosol optical properties are available. The UV radiation model is used to investigate the impact of changes in solar zenith angle, ozone abundance, surface albedo, and aerosol loading on UV radiation reaching the surface of the Earth. The ratios of diffuse to direct irradiance depend critically on solar zenith angle, surface albedo, and aerosol extinction. Ozone changes have pronounced effects on the global UVB irradiance but have only a minor effect on these ratios.

A technique for extracting height profiles from ground‐based column measurements at twilight is introduced. Its sensitivities to chemical processes, initialization, and air mass factors are investigated. The method is applied to observations made at Lauder, New Zealand, in 1987. The technique provides information on the vertical structure of atmospheric absorbers such as ozone or NO2 from the surface to about 50 km and is particularly valuable for identifying the influence of pollution on such measurements. When tropospheric pollution is low, it yields profiles in reasonable agreement with model predictions and with satellite measurements.

[1] The relationship between photolysis frequencies derived from spectroscopic measurements of actinic fluxes and irradiances was determined during a coordinated measurement campaign (International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Modeling Intercomparison campaign (IPMMI)). When differences in viewing geometries are taken into account, the measurements are in close agreement. An empirical relationship, which is useful for high sun (noon) conditions or for daily integrals, was found to convert irradiance data to photolysis frequencies. For low-sun conditions (large solar zenith angle), model calculations were shown to improve the accuracy. However, the input parameters to the model are site specific and the conversion depends on diffuse/ direct ratios. During cloudy conditions, significant improvements in the conversion can be achieved by assuming the radiation field to comprise entirely diffuse isotropic radiation when the UVA transmission by cloud is less than 0.8. Changing cloud conditions remain the greatest limitation, but they tend to bias the results away from the clear-sky case in a systematic way. Furthermore, although the cloud effects on the photolysis rates of nitrogen dioxide (J(NO 2 )) are rather large, they are much smaller for ozone photolysis (J(O 3 ! O( 1 D))), which is of prime importance in tropospheric chemistry. The study shows the potential for deriving historical and geographical differences in actinic fluxes from the extensive records of ground-based measurements of spectral irradiance.

During the period May 12–23, 1992, seven groups from seven countries met in Lauder, New Zealand, to intercompare their remote sensing instruments for the measurement of atmospheric column NO2 from the surface. The purpose of the intercomparison was to determine the degree of intercomparability and to qualify instruments for use in the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC). Three of the instruments which took part in the intercomparison are slated for deployment at primary NDSC sites. All instruments were successful in obtaining slant column NO2 amounts at sunrise and sunset on most of the 12 days of the intercomparison. The group as a whole was able to make measurements of the 90° solar zenith angle slant path NO2 column amount that agreed to about ±10% most of the time; however, the sensitivity of the individual measurements varied considerably. Part of the sensitivity problem for these measurements is the result of instrumentation, and part is related to the data analysis algorithms used. All groups learned a great deal from the intercomparison and improved their results considerably as a result of this exercise.