Background and objectives: Venous blood gas (VBG) analysis is a safer procedure than arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and may be an alternative for determining acid-base status.
OBJECTIVE Finerenone significantly improved cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease trial. We explored whether baseline HbA1c level and insulin treatment influenced outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with T2D, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 30–5,000 mg/g, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 to <75 mL/min/1.73 m2, and treated with optimized renin–angiotensin system blockade were randomly assigned to receive finerenone or placebo. Efficacy outcomes included kidney (kidney failure, sustained decrease ≥40% in eGFR from baseline, or renal death) and cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) composite endpoints. Patients were analyzed by baseline insulin use and by baseline HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol) or ≥7.5%. RESULTS Of 5,674 patients, 3,637 (64.1%) received insulin at baseline. Overall, 5,663 patients were included in the analysis for HbA1c; 2,794 (49.3%) had baseline HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol). Finerenone significantly reduced risk of the kidney composite outcome independent of baseline HbA1c level and insulin use (Pinteraction = 0.41 and 0.56, respectively). Cardiovascular composite outcome incidence was reduced with finerenone irrespective of baseline HbA1c level and insulin use (Pinteraction = 0.70 and 0.33, respectively). Although baseline HbA1c level did not affect kidney event risk, cardiovascular risk increased with higher HbA1c level. UACR reduction was consistent across subgroups. Adverse events were similar between groups regardless of baseline HbA1c level and insulin use; few finerenone-treated patients discontinued treatment because of hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS Finerenone reduces kidney and cardiovascular outcome risk in patients with CKD and T2D, and risks appear consistent irrespective of HbA1c levels or insulin use.
Background: The ratio of delta anion gap and delta bicarbonate (ΔAG/ΔHCO3) is used to detect co-existing acid-base disorders in patients with high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Classic teaching holds that in lactic acidosis, the ΔAG/ΔHCO3 is 1:1 within the first few hours of onset and subsequently rises to 1.8:1. However, this classic 1:1 stoichiometry in early lactic acidosis was derived primarily from animal models and only limited human data. The objective of this study was to examine the ΔAG/ΔHCO3 within the first hours of the development of lactic acidosis. Methods: Data were obtained prospectively from a convenience sample of adult trauma designated patients at a single level 1 trauma center. Venous samples, including a chemistry panel and serum lactate, were drawn prior to initiation of intravenous fluid resuscitation. Results: 108 patients were included. 63 patients had normal serum lactate levels (≤2.1 mmol/L) with a mean AG of 7.1 mEq/L, the value used to calculate subsequent ΔAG values. ΔAG/ΔHCO3 was calculated for 45 patients who had elevated serum lactate levels (>2.1 mmol/L). The mean ΔAG/ΔHCO3 for all patients with elevated serum lactate levels was 1.86 (SD 1.40). Conclusions: The mean ΔAG/ΔHCO3 was 1.86 within the first hours of the development of lactic acidosis due to hypovolemic shock, confirming a small prior human study. This contradicts the traditional belief that in lactic acidosis the ΔAG/ΔHCO3 is 1:1 within the first several hours. The classic 1:1 stoichiometry is based on animal models in which lactic acid is infused into the extracellular space, facilitating extracellular buffering of protons by bicarbonate. In contrast, our results demonstrate a higher initial ΔAG/ΔHCO3 ratio in early endogenous lactic acidosis in humans. Our analysis indicates that this is likely due to unmeasured anions contributing to an elevation in AG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.