Natural peptides displaying agonist activity on the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR54 were isolated from human placenta. These 54-, 14,-and 13-amino acid peptides, with a common RF-amide C terminus, derive from the product of KiSS-1, a metastasis suppressor gene for melanoma cells, and were therefore designated kisspeptins. They bound with low nanomolar affinities to rat and human GPR54 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells and stimulated PIP 2 hydrolysis, Ca 2؉ mobilization, arachidonic acid release, ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinase phosphorylation, and stress fiber formation but inhibited cell proliferation. Human GPR54 was highly expressed in placenta, pituitary, pancreas, and spinal cord, suggesting a role in the regulation of endocrine function. Stimulation of oxytocin secretion after kisspeptin administration to rats confirmed this hypothesis.

Dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that play key roles in both innate and adaptive immunity. ChemR23 is an orphan G protein–coupled receptor related to chemokine receptors, which is expressed specifically in these cell types. Here we present the characterization of chemerin, a novel chemoattractant protein, which acts through ChemR23 and is abundant in a diverse set of human inflammatory fluids. Chemerin is secreted as a precursor of low biological activity, which upon proteolytic cleavage of its COOH-terminal domain, is converted into a potent and highly specific agonist of ChemR23, the chemerin receptor. Activation of chemerin receptor results in intracellular calcium release, inhibition of cAMP accumulation, and phosphorylation of p42–p44 MAP kinases, through the Gi class of heterotrimeric G proteins. Chemerin is structurally and evolutionary related to the cathelicidin precursors (antibacterial peptides), cystatins (cysteine protease inhibitors), and kininogens. Chemerin was shown to promote calcium mobilization and chemotaxis of immature DCs and macrophages in a ChemR23-dependent manner. Therefore, chemerin appears as a potent chemoattractant protein of a novel class, which requires proteolytic activation and is specific for APCs.

A study has been undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of MALDI Q-TOF data for protein identification. The comparison of MS data of protein digests obtained on a conventional MALDI TOF instrument to the MS data from the MALDI Q-TOF reveal peptide patterns with similar intensity ratios. However, comparison of MS/MS Q-TOF data produced by nanoelectrospray versus MALDI reveals striking differences. Peptide fragment ions obtained from doubly charged precursors produced by nanoelectrospray are mainly y-type ions with some b-ions in the lower mass range. In contrast, peptide fragment ions produced from the singly charged ions originating from the MALDI source are a mixture of y-, b-and a-ions accompanied by ions resulting from neutral loss of ammonia or water. The ratio and intensity of these fragment ions is found to be strongly sequence dependent for MALDI generated ions. The singly charged peptides generated by MALDI show a preferential cleavage of the C-terminal bond of acidic residues aspartic and glutamic acid and the N-terminal bond of proline. This preferential cleavage can be explained by the mobile proton model and is present in peptides that contain both arginine and an acidic amino acid. The MALDI Q-TOF MS/MS data of 24 out of 26 proteolytic peptides produced by trypsin or Asp-N digestions were successfully used for protein identification via database searching, thus indicating the general usefulness of the data for protein identification. De novo sequencing using a mixture of 16 . This requires only small amounts of protein, provides a relatively fast identification and can easily be automated. In the second approach, fragment ion masses of one or more proteolytic peptides from a protein digest are determined, usually by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI MS/MS). Database searches can then be performed with different algorithms; either by using partly interpreted data or by submitting the list of fragment ions taken from the MS/MS spectra without any data interpretation [2,3]. However, both approaches suffer from some limitations. In peptide mass fingerprinting, results obtained are not always unambiguous and the method does not cope well with protein mixtures. On the other hand,

No abstract

No abstract