Child marriage in Indonesia is very vulnerable and has been increasing in recent years. In fact, the granting of marriage dispensation in the Religious Courts triggers several legal consequences that arise. Whereas in practice the judge's consideration is not always accepted regarding the marriage dispensation, the judge can also decide to reject the application for child marriage by looking at the existing legal aspects. Based on these problems, the author explains two problems that are the focus of this paper, namely how the legal consequences of the marriage dispensation on child marriage and the relevance of Religious Court Decisions with positive law. This study used empirical juridical research methods. Using secondary data through literature studies such as laws and regulations, court rulings, and legal theory, the method of data analysis uses qualitative methods. Then, this research conducted an empirical study of the literature from online sources. With the receipt of the application for dispensation for marriage, the right to be able to carry out marriages will be obtained so that the marriages carried out are legally recognized by the state and religion. However, even if the judge rejects the application for dispensation for marriage, the applicant can file an appeal at the Supreme Court. In fact, the role of judges is very important and judges also need to be selective when issuing a request for a marriage dispensation so that the increase in child marriage in Indonesia can be prevented.

The labeling of terrorists that the government has attached to the KKB in Papua has made this organization wanted by the TNI and POLRI. The eradication of terrorists is regulated in Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. This study aims to analyze the consequences of labeling KKB terrorists in Papua from a belligerent perspective according to international law. Belligerent is a rebel group that is recognized as a subject of international law. For this reason, this study uses a normative legal research method with a doctrinal approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials using literature study analysis. The results show that terrorists can be categorized as non-state actors who are not legitimized under international law and can be considered unlawful belligerents when they participate directly in the war. Therefore, the status of KKB terrorists in Papua under international law can be considered civilians as long as they are not involved in the fighting. If KKB terrorists are involved in combat, then their legal status becomes unlawful belligerent.

This article examines the DPRD authority over the impeachment of regional heads resulting from direct elections. Impeachment is a proposal for dismissal by DPRD against regional heads. The impeachment mechanism emerged after the amendment of the UUD 1945  along with democratic elections. The impeachment process carried out by the DPRD is based on Law Number 9 of 2015 and Government Regulation Number 12 of 2018. This study uses qualitative legal research and a normative juridical approach that is associated with a developing case. The data sources used in this study are primary and secondary legal materials, with analysis using deductive qualitative techniques and aiming to collect information as study material. The authority of the DPRD as a regional institution has a supervisory function over the policies taken by the government, namely the regional head. Through the impeachment mechanism, regional heads can be dismissed if they commit a violation. This study provides an explanation of the ideal mechanism for impeachment of regional heads in the perspective of constitutional law.