BackgroundA novel ibuprofen (IBU) formulation, Advil® Film-Coated Tablets (IBUNa), was developed.ObjectivePharmacokinetic comparison of IBUNa versus other IBU formulations.Study DesignTwo randomized, single-dose, open-label, five-way crossover pharmacokinetic studies.SettingInpatient research clinic.SubjectsSeventy-one healthy adult volunteers.InterventionStudy 1: In three periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg, Advil® Liqui-Gels® (IBULG) 2 × 200 mg, and Motrin® IB (IBUMot) 2 × 200 mg tablets. In two periods following a high-fat breakfast, subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg and IBULG 2 × 200 mg. Study 2: In five study periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg, Advil® FastGel® (IBUFG) 2 × 200 mg, Nurofen® (IBUNur) 2 × 200 mg, Advil® (IBUAdv) 2 × 200 mg, and Nurofen® Express containing IBU lysinate (IBULys) 2 × 342 mg.Main Outcome MeasureLog-transformed area under the plasma concentration versus time curve to last observable concentration (AUCL) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters; time to maximum measured plasma concentration (Tmax) was analyzed post hoc.ResultsIBUNa was bioequivalent to IBULG (fasted and fed) and IBUFG and IBULys (fasted) for rate (Cmax) and extent (AUCL) of IBU absorption. After fasting, AUCL was bioequivalent for IBUNa and IBUMot, IBUAdv, and IBUNur, but Cmax occurred significantly earlier with IBUNa. After fasting, median IBUNaTmax was comparable to that for IBULG, IBUFG, and IBULys, but was much shorter than that for IBUMot, IBUNur, and IBUAdv. Food slowed absorption of IBUNa and IBULG similarly. All treatments were tolerated similarly.ConclusionIBUNa is absorbed faster but to a similar extent as standard IBU formulations.

Objectives:A novel, immediate-release tablet formulation of ibuprofen (IBU) sodium dihydrate, Advil Film Coated Tablets (IBUNa), has been developed that is absorbed faster than standard IBU tablets. The objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy and onset of analgesia of this new formulation with standard IBU tablets after a single dose.Materials and Methods:Patients (N=316) with at least moderate baseline postsurgical dental pain were randomized to 400 mg IBUNa, Advil (IBUAdv), Motrin (IBUMot), or placebo. Primary endpoints were time-weighted sum of pain relief (PR) and pain intensity differences over 8 hours (SPRID 0-8) and time to onset of meaningful pain relief (TMPR) measured by the double-stopwatch method.Results:SPRID 0-8 was significantly greater for IBUNa and the other active treatments versus placebo (P<0.001). IBUNa had a significantly earlier TMPR versus placebo, pooled IBUAdv/IBUMot, and IBUMot (P<0.001 for all), and a marginally faster TMPR (P=0.075) versus IBUAdv. Results for secondary endpoints were similar. Adverse events were comparable across treatment groups, with gastrointestinal disorders being most frequently reported. Most adverse events were mild or moderate.Discussion:This novel formulation of IBUNa provided superior overall PR compared with placebo and more rapid onset of analgesic effect compared with standard IBU tablets. Rapid PR is important in the treatment of acute pain, including dental pain, and this IBUNa formulation represents a new treatment option for rapid PR.

This method will enable more detailed and specific studies of BB-12 in probiotic supplements, including when in combination with LGG.

Introduction Ibuprofen and acetaminophen provide analgesia via different mechanisms of action and do not exhibit drugdrug interactions; therefore, combining low doses of each may provide greater efficacy without compromising safety. Objectives The present study assessed the analgesic efficacy of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of ibuprofen/acetaminophen (IBU/APAP) compared with ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo. Methods This 12-h, double-blind, proof-of-concept study compared three FDCs of IBU/APAP (200 mg/500 mg, 250 mg/500 mg, and 300 mg/500 mg) with ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe pain following third molar extraction. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted sum of pain relief and pain intensity difference scores from 0 to 8 h after dosing (SPRID[4] 0-8). Time to meaningful pain relief (TMPR), duration of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Results In total, 394 patients were randomized. All active treatments were superior to placebo for SPRID[4] 0-8 (all p < 0.001) but not significantly different from ibuprofen 400 mg. Median TMPR with FDCs and ibuprofen (44.5-54.1 and 56.2 min, respectively) was faster than with placebo (> 720 min; all p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Duration of pain relief was similar with the FDCs and ibuprofen 400 mg (9.7-11.1 h) and longer than with placebo (1.6 h; all p < 0.001). AE incidence was comparable with all treatments. Conclusion Each IBU/APAP FDC provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that with ibuprofen 400 mg and superior to that with placebo. Each FDC provided MPR in < 1 h, duration of pain relief > 9 h, and tolerability similar to that with ibuprofen and placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT01559259

Objectives: A previous pilot study demonstrated that various fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of ibuprofen (IBU) and acetaminophen (APAP) provided analgesic efficacy comparable to a higher dose of IBU, with the same safety profile. These studies further evaluated the chosen FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg formulation. Materials and Methods: Two phase 3 dental pain studies enrolled healthy young patients with ≥moderate pain after ≥3 third molar extractions who received single-dose FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg, IBU 250 mg, APAP 650 mg, or placebo evaluated over 12 hours (study 1) or multiple-dose FDC or placebo every 8 hours, evaluated over 48 hours (study 2). Time-weighted sum of pain intensity differences over 8 (SPID[11]0-8) and 24 (SPID[11]0-24) hours were primary outcomes, respectively. Time to meaningful pain relief and duration of pain relief were assessed; tolerability was evaluated by adverse events. Results: Five hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized in study 1; 123 in study 2. Study 1: SPID[11]0-8 favored FDC significantly over placebo, IBU, and APAP (P<0.001, P=0.008, and P<0.001, respectively); study 2: SPID[11]0-24 significantly favored FDC over placebo (P<0.001), with sustained efficacy during multiple dosing. Time to meaningful pain relief occurred within 1 hour; pain relief duration was >8 hours in both studies. Adverse event rates were lowest with the FDC. Discussion: FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg provides superior analgesic efficacy to individual monocomponents (IBU 250 mg and APAP 650 mg), a rapid onset of action, >8-hour duration of pain relief, is generally well tolerated, and may provide an additional nonopioid treatment option for acute pain.