Background Genital burns have devastating effects on patient and have been classified by the American Burn Association as major burn injury. The management of these injuries continues to challenge reconstructive surgeons. Cryopreserved skin allografts have been successfully used to manage partial-thickness skin burns; however, dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane (DHACM) represents novel technology. Dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane outcomes have not been sufficiently studied to guide its use on genital burns. The objective of this study was to report on the outcomes of dehydrated amniotic membrane as a biologic skin dressing on genital burns injury compared with cryopreserved allografts. Methods Retrospective review of data collected from our institutional burn registry from 2012 to 2017. The study population included patients with partial-thickness genital burns admitted between 2012 and 2017 treated with either dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane or cryopreserved allografts. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. Results Thirty patients with genital burns who received DHACM skin and cryopreserved allografts were included in the analysis. The mean age for the DHACM group was 27.6 years compared with 33.5 years for the cryopreserved group. The mean total body surface area was 3.8% in the DHACM group compared with 7.2% in the cryopreserved group (P = non-significant (ns)). The mean injury severity score was not significantly different between groups. Patients receiving cadaveric allografts had a higher number of skin substitute surgical reapplications as compared with the DHACM group (28% vs 0%, P ≤ 0.05). All patients who received DHACM skin substitutes healed by 2 weeks postoperative compared with 76% of patients who received cryopreserved skin allografts (P = 0.03, χ2). Conclusions Dehydrated amniotic membrane skin substitutes are a safe alternative in the treatment of genital burns. Its use achieves comparable benefits with no major significant difference in terms of complication, supporting the safety of amniotic membrane to treat genital burns.

Introduction: Facial burns have significant physical and psychological effects on patients, and minimizing morbidity continues to be a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Advancements have allowed the development of various skin substitutes. Among these, human dehydrated amniotic skin substitutes represent novel technology, yet their outcome has not been sufficiently studied to guide practice. The objective of our study is to compare the safety of amniotic membrane skin substitutes in the treatment of adult and pediatric facial burns. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of our institutional burn registry, with 90 burn patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Demographic and outcome measures included age, percentage of total body surface area (TBSA), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and complications (eg, pigmentation, hypertrophic scar, infection, and delayed healing). Paired sample t test and Chi-squared test were used, with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: Seventy-seven adults and 13 pediatric patients with facial burns who had received dehydrated amniotic membrane skin substitutes were included in the analysis. The mean age was 40.8 years for adults and 5.6 years for children. Mean TBSA was similar, with 9.6% (1−57%) in adults and 6.0% (2−14%) in children. The mean ISS did not significantly differ between groups (4.0 versus 2.2, P = ns). Pediatric patients with facial burns treated with amniotic membranes had a higher incidence of dyspigmentation relative to adult patients (46.2% versus 9.1%, P ≤ 0.05). Remaining morbidities were not significantly different between adult and pediatric patients. All patients, irrespective of group, healed by the second post-operative week. Conclusion: Dehydrated amniotic membrane skin substitutes are a safe alternative in the treatment of facial burns across all ages.

Background: Facial burns have significant physical and psychologic effects on patients. Human dehydrated amniotic membrane represents novel technology, yet its outcome has not been sufficiently studied to guide practice. The objective of our study is to compare the benefits of amniotic membrane (DHAM) to amniotic/chorionic membrane (DHACM) skin substitutes to treat partial thickness facial burns. Methods: Retrospective review of data collected from our institutional burn registry from 2012 to 2016. Demographic characteristics including age, total body surface area (TBSA) burn and injury severity scores were collected and outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. Paired sample t-test and Chi-squared were used with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: A total of 77 adult patients with partial thickness facial burns who received DHAM and DHACM skin substitutes were included in the analysis. The mean age for the DHAM group was 39.8 compared to 41.4 for the DHACM. Mean TBSA was similar, with 10.9% in the DHAM group compared to 8.3% in the DHACM. Patients receiving DHAM had higher requirement for skin substitute surgical reapplications as compared to the DHACM group (23.7% versus 5.1%, P ≤ 0.05). Remaining morbidities remained low and not significantly different between patients receiving DHAM and DHACM substitutes (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The DHAM and DHACM skin substitutes are valid and safe alternatives in the treatment of adult partial thickness facial burns.

Background: Facial burns have lasting physical and psychological effects on pediatric patients. Proper management to minimize morbidities challenges reconstructive surgeons. New technologies allowed the development of skin substitutes such as amniotic and chorionic membranes, yet the use of these skin dressings and their impact on burn outcomes have not been sufficiently studied to guide practices. The objective of this study is to report on the outcomes of dehydrated amniotic membrane as a biologic skin dressing in pediatric facial burn injury compared to cadaveric allografts. Methods: Retrospective review of data collected from our institutional burn registry from 2012 to 2016. The study population included patients younger than 16 years with facial burns. Patients between 2012 and 2014 received cadaveric allografts, whereas during 2015 to 2016 patients received dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane as standard treatment. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Included 30 patients with a mean age of 3.7 years and with an average total body surface area burn of 6.8% (2%–27%). Mean injury severity scores did not significantly differ between both groups, 1.8 in amniotic group versus 2.3 in cadaveric skin group (P > 0.05). There were 4 complications (3 hypertrophic scars and 1 wound infection) in the cadaveric allografts group versus no complications in the amniotic membrane group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Dehydrated amniotic/chorionic membrane wound dressings are a safe alternative to cadaveric allografts in treating pediatric partial thickness facial burns.

Dislocation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the displacement of the head of the condyle from its normal position in the glenoid fossa. Anterior dislocations are the most common type of TMJ dislocations. Prognathism of the lower jaw, anterior crossbite, and open bite are the classic features in bilateral TMJ dislocations. The treatment of acute TMJ dislocation involves manual reduction with or without general anesthesia. The use of maxillomandibular fixation is reserved for chronic, more complex dislocations. Determining the presence of a predisposing factor is very important in guiding the correct treatment and management for this condition. The authors present a case of acute spontaneous temporomandibular joint dislocation where multiple predisposing factors were recognized, requiring treatment with maxillomandibular fixation after manual reduction.