Purpose of review Over the past year, loss of appetite in patients with cancer has continued to be an area of active investigation. This review provides an update of recently published findings. Recent findings Despite the emergence of new cancer therapeutic agents, this symptom of loss of appetite continues to trouble patients, and it continues to be associated with poor survival. Recent preclinical research promises to lead to newer approaches and newer, more effective palliative agents. Recent clinical research shows that agents such as olanzapine, anamorelin, and cannabis either do or might palliate this symptom. Summary Loss of appetite in patients with cancer remains an important area of clinical and research focus. Recent published data provide greater clarity with respect to how to palliate this symptom. Today, although clinicians have more options to palliate cancer-associated loss of appetite than ever before, questions remain unanswered about how to palliate this symptom optimally and how to improve the quality of life of patients who suffer from it.

1552 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related (ICI) pneumonitis poses a significant challenge in patients with cancer. There is a need for predictive modeling to identify those at high risk of developing serious adverse events of ICI pneumonitis. Methods: A newly created database of cancer patients diagnosed with ICI pneumonitis seen at Mayo Clinic from 2014-2022 was utilized for exploratory data analysis. Modeling was used to determine if three clinical outcomes could be predicted, namely risk of death from: pneumonitis prior to starting immunotherapy, pneumonitis at time of diagnosis of ICI pneumonitis, and any cause at time of ICI pneumonitis diagnosis. The data consisted of 170 patients with annotation for 71 clinical features. Data was divided into features available at time of cancer diagnosis and at time of ICI pneumonitis diagnosis. Exploratory modeling was performed using the gradient boosting technique Xgboost (Chen, 2015) and conducted using k-fold balanced cross validation best practices as well as a train/test/validate schema with 70%/20%/10% data proportions, respectively. Model reverse engineering was done with Shapley statistics (Lundberg, 2017) to determine which features had the largest contribution per model. Once identified, only those highly weighted features were used for logistic regression analysis providing more reproducible predictions by decreasing model variance. Results: Risk of death from pneumonitis prior to starting immunotherapy was modeled with an area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.79 with the most contributory features including lymphocyte count, oxygen dependence, PFT values, and PD-L1 expression. Logistic regression produced an AUC-ROC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.72-1.0, p < 0.0013). Risk of death from pneumonitis at the time of ICI pneumonitis diagnosis was modeled with an AUC-ROC of 0.85 and the most contributory features were similar to the list described in the previous endpoint. Logistic regression produced an AUC-ROC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.96, p < 0.0001). Risk of death from any cause at the time of ICI pneumonitis diagnosis until follow up concluded by 12/2022 produced a model with an AUC-ROC of 0.75 with the most contributory features including supplemental oxygen, PFT values, basic laboratory values, and PD-L1 expression, among others. Logistic regression produced an AUC-ROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.93, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: We demonstrate that commonly available clinical data can be used to identify patients at high risk of death from ICI pneumonitis. This study identified clinical features that were predictive in each scenario from which further concerted effort could produce a new clinical model to provide clinician decision support when considering immunotherapy. Further studies should be done to further elucidate feature interdependence and generalizability.

No abstract

1535 Background: Ambulatory management of select patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) may substantially decrease patients’ burden of illness and improve their quality of life, and is recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. However, in the United States, inpatient management remains the universal standard. We hereby report the health care utilization associated with the DEFeNDR remote patient monitoring (RPM) program, which leverages technology and virtual centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management of FN as an alternative to hospital-based care. Methods: Adult patients with cancer hospitalized with FN were assessed daily for eligibility to participate in the DEFeNDR program. Eligibility criteria included MASCC score >21 (per ASCO guidelines), and clinical judgment of the attending provider. Patients receiving cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days were excluded. Eligible patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program were provided a kit containing cellular-enabled, pre-connected devices to facilitate monitoring, including twice-daily vital signs and electronic symptom questionnaires. Data were EHR-integrated in real-time and embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. RPM nurses responded to alerts and escalated care as indicated by pre-specified care pathways. Program assessment was performed at 20 weeks after full implementation. The primary outcome was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility compared between those who participated in the program vs. those who declined. Results: 35 patients were offered participation in the DEFeNDR program. Of these, 17 participated and 18 declined. Baseline characteristics are provided. Participating patients experienced mPEDI of 6.9% (Standard Error [SE], 3.7%), compared with 17.7% (SE, 3.6%) for patients who declined participation. Due to small sample size, this difference (10.8%) did not reach statistical significance (Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.15). 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Mean inpatient days were also lower for patients participating in the program. Additionally, when readmitted, patients participating in RPM experienced a trend toward shorter length of stay and lower rates of intensive care unit utilization. Conclusions: A trend towards decreased burden of inpatient care is evident among patients participating in the DEFeNDR program. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.[Table: see text]