Portions of tbjs document m y be ikgiblc io electronic imnge produck h a g s are produced from the best available original document DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or reSponGbility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disdosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, pmces, or service by trade name, trademark ABSTRACTThis document is the user's manual for the third-generation CHEMKIN package. CHEMKIN is a software package whose purpose is to facilitate the formation, solution, and interpretation of problems involving elementary gas-phase chemical kinetics. It provides a flexible and powerful tool for incorporating complex chemical kinetics into simulations of fluid dynamics. The package consists of two major software components: an Interpreter and a Gas-Phase Subroutine Library. The Interpreter is a program that reads a symbolic description of an elementary, user-specified chemical reaction mechanism. One output from the Interpreter is a data file that forms a link to the Gas-Phase Subroutine Library. This library is a collection of about 100 highly modular FORTRAN subroutines that may be called to return information on equations of state, thermodynamic properties, and chemical production rates. CHEMKIN-I11 includes capabilities for treating multi-fluid plasma systems, that are not in thermal equilibrium. These new capabilities allow researchers to describe chemistry systems that are characterized by more than one temperature, in which reactions may depend on temperatures associated with different species; i.e. reactions may be driven by collisions with electrons, ions, or charge-neutral species. These new features have been implemented in such a way as to require little or no changes to CHEMKIN implementation for systems in thermal equilibrium, where all species share the same gas temperature. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSCHEMKIN-I11 now has the capability to handle weakly ionized plasma chemistry, especially for applications related to advanced semiconductor processing. This aspect of the work was supported, in large part, through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with SEMATECH. Dr. Andrew Labun, at Digital Equipment Corporation, has been very generous of his time and energies in suggesting the ways in which CHEMKIN can better meet the needs of the advanced semiconductor processing industry. Prof. Mark Cappelli at Stanford University provided an initial vision, which established the technical direction for the multi-fluid formulation that is implemented in CHEMKIN-111.CHEMKIN-I11 also has enhanced capabilities to handle a variety of pressure-dependent unimolecular-falloff and bimolecular chemically activated processes. Dr. ...

No abstract

This paper presents a new computational framework for modeling chemically reacting flow in anode-supported solid-oxide fuel cells ͑SOFC͒. Depending on materials and operating conditions, SOFC anodes afford a possibility for internal reforming or catalytic partial oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels. An important new element of the model is the capability to represent elementary heterogeneous chemical kinetics in the form of multistep reaction mechanisms. Porous-media transport in the electrodes is represented with a dusty-gas model. Charge-transfer chemistry is represented in a modified Butler-Volmer setting that is derived from elementary reactions, but assuming a single rate-limiting step. The model is discussed in terms of systems with defined flow channels and planar membrane-electrode assemblies. However, the underlying theory is independent of the particular geometry. Solid oxide fuel cells ͑SOFC͒ can be operated with a variety of fuels, including hydrogen, CO, hydrocarbons, or mixtures of these. This is possible because of the relatively high operating temperatures, and, at least in conventional SOFC anodes, the use of transition metal catalysts that promote the water-gas-shift reactionand steam reforming, which for methane may be written globally asIf sufficient steam is produced electrochemically at the anode/ electrolyte interface by the reactionthen reforming and shifting can, in principle, lead to full ͑if indirect͒ electrochemical oxidation of a hydrocarbon fuel. However, competing reaction pathways catalyzed by transition metals may also lead to solid carbon deposition, which can quickly destroy the anode. For this reason, some degree of upstream fuel processing, eiher by catalytic partial oxidation or by steam reforming, is usually used to produce a fuel stream that is rich in H 2 and CO and dilute in residual hydrocarbons before reaching the SOFC. Because upstream processing adds to the complexity, size, and cost of the overall plant, it is of considerable interest to minimize or even eliminate the need for it. There is evidence that mixing some oxygen with a hydrocarbon fuel can deliver good performance.1 In this case there must be partial oxidation within the anode structrue. Another promising alternative to utilize hydrocarbon fuels "directly" in SOFCs is to use a ceria oxidation catalyst instead of a transition metal. 2Whether an SOFC uses a "reforming anode" with a transition metal catalyst, or a "direct oxidation" anode with a ceria-based catalyst, or perhaps uses a different, novel anode design, optimizing the system to run efficiently on hydrocarbon or hydrocarbon-derived fuels is a very challenging problem, due to the complex, coupled physico-chemical processes involved. When significant CO and/or hydrocarbons are present in the fuel, models must also account for the in situ production of hydrogen through reforming and shifting reactions within the anode, as well as solid-carbon formation.Many questions of interest for optimization studies cannot currently be answered easily. For example, for...

No abstract

Protonic ceramic fuel cells, like their higher-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell counterparts, can directly use both hydrogen and hydrocarbon fuels to produce electricity at potentially more than 50 per cent efficiency. Most previous direct-hydrocarbon fuel cell research has focused on solid-oxide fuel cells based on oxygen-ion-conducting electrolytes, but carbon deposition (coking) and sulfur poisoning typically occur when such fuel cells are directly operated on hydrocarbon- and/or sulfur-containing fuels, resulting in severe performance degradation over time. Despite studies suggesting good performance and anti-coking resistance in hydrocarbon-fuelled protonic ceramic fuel cells, there have been no systematic studies of long-term durability. Here we present results from long-term testing of protonic ceramic fuel cells using a total of 11 different fuels (hydrogen, methane, domestic natural gas (with and without hydrogen sulfide), propane, n-butane, i-butane, iso-octane, methanol, ethanol and ammonia) at temperatures between 500 and 600 degrees Celsius. Several cells have been tested for over 6,000 hours, and we demonstrate excellent performance and exceptional durability (less than 1.5 per cent degradation per 1,000 hours in most cases) across all fuels without any modifications in the cell composition or architecture. Large fluctuations in temperature are tolerated, and coking is not observed even after thousands of hours of continuous operation. Finally, sulfur, a notorious poison for both low-temperature and high-temperature fuel cells, does not seem to affect the performance of protonic ceramic fuel cells when supplied at levels consistent with commercial fuels. The fuel flexibility and long-term durability demonstrated by the protonic ceramic fuel cell devices highlight the promise of this technology and its potential for commercial application.