Through the use of ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) and a single-sided solid oxide electrochemical cell (SOC), we have studied the mechanism of electrocatalytic splitting of water (H 2 O + 2e − → H 2 + O 2− ) and electro-oxidation of hydrogen (H 2 + O 2− → H 2 O + 2e − ) at ∼700°C in 0.5 Torr of H 2 /H 2 O on ceria (CeO 2−x ) electrodes. The experiments reveal a transient buildup of surface intermediates (OH − and Ce 3+ ) and show the separation of charge at the gas−solid interface exclusively in the electrochemically active region of the SOC. During water electrolysis on ceria, the increase in surface potentials of the adsorbed OH − and incorporated O 2− differ by 0.25 eV in the active regions. For hydrogen electro-oxidation on ceria, the surface concentrations of OH − and O 2− shift significantly from their equilibrium values. These data suggest that the same charge transfer step (H 2 O + Ce 3+ ⇔ Ce 4+ + OH − + H • ) is rate limiting in both the forward (water electrolysis) and reverse (H 2 electrooxidation) reactions. This separation of potentials reflects an induced surface dipole layer on the ceria surface and represents the effective electrochemical double layer at a gas−solid interface. The in situ XPS data and DFT calculations show that the chemical origin of the OH − /O 2− potential separation resides in the reduced polarization of the Ce−OH bond due to the increase of Ce 3+ on the electrode surface. These results provide a graphical illustration of the electrochemically driven surface charge transfer processes under relevant and nonultrahigh vacuum conditions.
■ INTRODUCTIONUnderstanding the mechanisms of charge separation and charge transfer at electrochemical interfaces is essential for the rational development of electrochemical devices, such as batteries, fuel cells, electrolyzers, and supercapacitors. 1,2 However, the materials and operating conditions employed in real world applications of these technologies are usually quite different from those used in surface science studies on model systems (i.e., the "pressure and materials gap"). 3−5 This disconnect is particularly problematic with high temperature electrochemical energy conversion devices with multicomponent materials (e.g., solid oxide fuel cells, electrolyzers, and electrocatalytic fuel processors) 6 for which in situ surface experiments at cell operating temperatures (typically >500°C) are challenging. 7 Because of the experimental constraints of most surface science experiments, the knowledge and understanding of the surface processes at relevant conditions are limited and rely on extrapolations from ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions and modeling studies. 8 As a result, the electrochemical surface processes are not well understood. For example, the nonFaradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity (NEMCA or EPOC) 9 can significantly enhance the rates of catalytic transformation of over 100 reactions, 3,10 yet the origins of this enhancement are not fully understood. 3 Even the mechanism ...