No abstract

Paramedics have been regulated in the UK since 2003. Analysis shows that the profession has had consistently higher rates of self-referral to its regulator compared with other health and care professions. Between 2013 and 2016, the percentage of paramedics who self-referred averaged 50% of all cases, compared with 6% across all other health professions regulated by the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) and 10% across social workers in England. This article reports on possible reasons underlying this trend. Using a mixed-methods approach including a literature review, interviews, focus groups and case analysis, the study identified a number of possible contributory factors. These included pressurised work environments, variable guidance and support from employers, and work cultures of fear and conflict. The evolving nature of the profession was also cited. The research found that there was a cohort of cases that appeared inappropriate—where the referral was for a matter that did not require reporting. Actions are being taken to reduce such self-referrals to avoid the emotional distress and resource implications for those involved.

Paramedicine is evolving into a graduate occupation underpinned by evidence-based practice and the development of professionalism. There is a disproportionate number of fitness-to-practise concerns against paramedics in the UK compared with other health professions, with the exception of medicine and dentistry. This article details findings from a Delphi process which invited expert responses to questions relating to concerns and preventative measures. The findings highlighted three levels of explanation: societal issues (public expectations and media attention); organisational issues (pressure on services and employer factors); and issues relating to individual paramedics. Preventative measures focused on input from employers, regulators, educators and registrants themselves and included: managing public expectations; more regulatory engagement; increasing organisational support; and changes to the selection and education of the workforce. A Delphi statement that reached 100% consensus pointed to the positive implications of reporting as it suggests increased awareness of avenues for raising concerns.

This article examines the nature of, and reasons for, the disproportionately high rates of fitness to practise referrals of social workers in England to the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), compared with other professions regulated by HCPC during 2014–2016. In 2014–2015, the rate of referrals for social workers was 1.42 per cent of registrants, compared with an average for the sixteen professions regulated by HCPC of 0.66 per cent. Drawing on published statistics and unique analysis of a sample of 232 case files undertaken as part of a research project in 2016–2017, the article highlights relatively high rates of inappropriate referrals from ‘members of the public’ (mainly service users) particularly in relation to child placements and contact. A detailed picture is offered of the variety of referrals dealt with at each stage of the fitness to practise process (from initial triage to final hearings), with recommendations for how to prevent inappropriate referrals, whilst focusing concern on the most serious cases of incompetence and misconduct. This research is of significance at a time of increasing pressure for social workers, social services and service users under conditions of austerity and managerialism; on-going concerns about standards in social work; and recent changes in social work regulation.

No abstract