The progression of pancreatic oncogenesis requires immune-suppressive inflammation in cooperation with oncogenic mutations. However, the drivers of intra-tumoral immune tolerance are uncertain. Dectin-1 is an innate immune receptor critical in anti-fungal immunity, but its role in sterile inflammation and oncogenesis is not well-defined. Further, non-pathogen-derived ligands for Dectin-1 have not been characterized. We found that Dectin-1 is highly expressed on macrophages in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Dectin-1 ligation accelerated PDA, whereas Dectin-1 deletion or blockade of its downstream signaling was protective. We found that Dectin-1 ligates the lectin Galectin-9 in the PDA tumor microenvironment resulting in tolerogenic macrophage programming and adaptive immune suppression. Upon interruption of the Dectin-1–Galectin-9 axis, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells – which are dispensable to PDA progression in hosts with an intact signaling axis – become reprogrammed into indispensable mediators of anti-tumor immunity. These data suggest that targeting Dectin-1 signaling is an attractive strategy for the immunotherapy of PDA.

Background:PM00104 binds guanines at DNA minor grooves, impacting DNA replication and transcription. A phase I study was undertaken to investigate safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PKs) and preliminary antitumour activity of PM00104 as a 1- or 3-h infusion three-weekly.Methods:Patients with advanced solid tumours received PM00104 in a dose escalation trial, as guided by toxicity and PK data.Results:A total of 47 patients were treated; 27 patients on the 1-h schedule (0.23–3.6 mg m−2) and 20 patients on the 3-h schedule (1.8–3.5 mg m−2). Dose-limiting toxicities comprised reversible nausea, vomiting, fatigue, elevated transaminases and thrombocytopenia, establishing the 1-h schedule RP2D at 3.0 mg m−2. With the 3-h schedule, DLTs of reversible hypotension and neutropenia established the RP2D at 2.8 mg m−2. Common PM00104-related adverse events at the RP2D comprised grade 1–2 nausea, fatigue and myelosuppression. In both schedules, PKs increased linearly, but doses over the 1-h schedule RP2D resulted in higher than proportional increases in exposure. A patient with advanced urothelial carcinoma had RECIST shrinkage by 49%, and three patients had RECIST stable disease ⩾6 months.Conclusion:PM00104 is well tolerated, with preliminary evidence of antitumour activity observed. The 1-h 3-weekly schedule is being assessed in phase II clinical trials.

516 Background: Addition of neoadjuvant carboplatin (Cb) to paclitaxel (T) followed by doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC) improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to T/AC in TNBC. An anthracycline-free regimen of Cb plus docetaxel (D) also yields high pCR rates in TNBC, and patients achieving pCR with this regimen demonstrate excellent 3-year outcomes without adjuvant anthracycline. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant regimens CbT→AC and CbD in TNBC. Methods: In this multicenter study, eligible patients with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to either paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every week X 12 + carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks X 4, followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks X 4 (CbT→AC, Arm A), or to carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days X 6 cycles (CbD, Arm B). The primary endpoint was pCR (no evidence of invasive tumor in the breast and axilla). The two regimens were compared for differences in pCR, residual cancer burden (RCB), treatment delivery, and toxicity. Results: Between 2015 and 2018, 100 patients were randomized; 48 to Arm A and 52 to Arm B. Median age was 52 years, median tumor size was 2.7 cm, 30% were lymph node-positive and 17% carried a BRCA1/2 mutation. Baseline demographic and tumor characteristics were balanced between two arms. pCR was 55% (95%CI: 41%-59%) in Arm A and 52% (95%CI: 39%-65%) in Arm B, p =0.84. RCB 0+1 rate was 67% in both arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (73% vs 21%, p < 0.0001), with most notable differences in rates of G3/4 neutropenia (Arm A = 60%, Arm B = 8%, p = 0.0001), febrile neutropenia (Arm A = 18%, Arm B = 0%, p = 0.0001), and G3/4 anemia (Arm A = 46%, Arm B = 4%, p = 0.0001). 81% of Arm A patients completed all 4 doses of AC and 4 doses of Cb, and 71% completed > 9 doses of T. 90% of Arm B patients completed all 6 doses of CbD (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The non-anthracycline platinum regimen of CbD yields pCR and RCB 0+1 rates similar to 4-drug regimen of CbTàAC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and higher treatment completion rate. The CbD regimen should be further explored as a way to de-escalate therapy in TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02413320.

No abstract

No abstract